The Hadiths are the collected stories, sayings and imparted warnings of Mohammed, the founder of the collectivist, totalitarian Meccan cult devoted to the Allah [contraction ilah], the 'Lord' of Mecca, who was of course the moon deity or Hu'Baal. Mohammed's full name was Abdullah, or slave of Allah. The pagan and quite celestial antecedents of Hu'Baal or the Meccan ilah are obvious to any who have taken the time to study Arab history. Mohammed was no more than a deranged brigand, a thug with an army, who raped, killed, plundered, sex-slaved and murdered, whilst becoming incredibly wealthy. Academics and sundry experts declaim the life of this warlord illustrates a prophet-hood, holding high the mantle of religiosity, waving a standard of peace.
The Hadiths of Bukhari are the 3rd most important liturgical source of inspiration for Moslems, after Mein Koran, and Mein Sira [a purported biography of Mohammed]. They are holy. Following the Koran they are also quite bloody and intolerant. The Hadiths were written in about 900 AD or some 270 years after Mohammed's death. They were culled from the oral traditions, scraps of writings and the general Moslem memory. The Hadiths show a cult that is deformed, violent and Jihadic.
Bukhari's work is of dubious authenticity. It is massive, ponderous, incoherent, poorly written and organized. It thus mimics the Koran. The messaging is clear however. Mohammed is the supreme representation of divine favour. Everything he said and did was therefore of inestimable importance. If you don't follow this divine 'messenger' you transgress against the divine law and are thus open for punishment.
The main theme of Bukhari's Hadiths is 4:52:196:
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)" (Bukhari Hadith, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196) Source
Saved through Mohammed ? This is a plagiarism from the Bible. The New Testament discusses the human being 'saved' through his belief in Christ whose mission was the exact opposites of Mohammed's. Islam is thereby the anti-Christ doctrine. Christ tells his apostles”
Mark 16:15-18, "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."
In Bukhari's Hadith passage above it is only Mohammed who can save humans and provide salvation. One intention of Mohammedansim is to replace Christ with the founder of the monotheistic ilah cult. But why would anyone believe that a man who murdered, sex-slaved, owned a harem, waged war, cut of the heads of Jews and Christians and tortured his enemies can now magically 'save them' ? From what exactly ? People like Mohammed ?
For geniuses, ISIS or ISIL is not Islam. The cult of Mecca is always portrayed as singularly civilized, advanced, tolerant and progressive. This is why the Moslem world today is a cesspool mess of blood, death, illiteracy, polygamy, slavery, misogyny and poverty. Obviously Islam is so vaunted, it leads to the modern Moslem state – impoverished, riven by violence, incest and destruction.
“Barack Obama has made it clear: “ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents.” David Cameron intoned: “What we are witnessing is actually a battle between Islam on the one hand and extremists who want to abuse Islam on the other. These extremists, often funded by fanatics living far away from the battlefields, pervert the Islamic faith as a way of justifying their warped and barbaric ideology – and they do so not just in Iraq and Syria but right across the world, from Boko Haram and al-Shabaab to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Source
Obama a Moslem sympathizer, and the entire Western elite including the arch-Moslemophile Cameron, are insipid, blind, dangerous, deluded and ignorant. They are plutocratic morons fully invested in their Marxist-Multiculturalist contra-reality theology. Obama entombed inside the Moslem Brotherhood's influence; has said nothing about the 3.000 or so Christians brutally executed by ISIS including women and children. He only wails pity about the dead Moslems ISIS has dispatched on behalf of the moon deity HuBaal the Lord of Mecca or ilah. Cameron and his fellow multicult travellers are accessories to murder pure and simple. They are doing nothing to stop the slaughter of Christians in Iraq and Syria. Even worse, being good simpletons they will import more of these desert Allah fascists into their states, until the Western world is just a larger version of Brussels or Kosovo.
ISIS is Islam. Islam is ISIS. ISIS is simply implementing Sharia – Koranic 'law', or Moslem bronze-age barbaric theocratic rule. A fact loss on academics, the media and witless politicians such as Cameron and Obama.
The Russian invasion of the Ukraine is rather obvious. This incursion into foreign territory was easily predicted back 6 or 7 years ago, by simply listening to the neo-Soviet Politburo chatter in the Kremlin. The intention is to annex not just the Crimea – a tasty starter – but the industrialized, mineral-rich Eastern Ukraine. Russian troops in their thousands now operate in the Ukraine, yet Western Russophiles deny the invasion, deny the bloodshed initiated by the Neo-Soviet cabal in Moscow, and even defend Russian eradication of Ukrainian sovereignty in the Crimea and the Eastern Ukraine. If China invades Siberia or the neo-Soviet borderlands rich with resources; I would expect the same cacophony of stupidity to rain down in support of the Chinese invasion.
According to Russophile geniuses, the Ukrainian government is 'fascist' [Hitler's cult of evolution and race supremacy I suppose they mean]; is engaged in killing Ukrainians by the score; whilst Russia is simply trying to 'feed' and 'cloth' the 'poor people' caught in the Ukrainian government's Hobbesian war of the state Leviathan against the peasants. Marxist revolutionary chants and sloganeering included. Apparently the 'Ukrainian separatists' are freedom loving pro-Moscow, pro-human rights saints, desirous of trade, culture, peace and love.
One would expect that such a distorted mental illness in viewing an obvious invasion, informs the Russophile's view of Islam – obviously 'most' Moslems [like the Russians] are peaceniks, intent on inter-faith harmony and understanding. If there is violence in the name of the cult of Submission, than blame the victim. If the Russians invade a neighbouring country, blame the raped and plundered.
If Putin were to cut off Porosenko's head with his own macho-army issued machete, the Russophiles [aka Soviet supporters]; would blame the Ukrainian untermensch, just as Moslemophiles ignore the severed heads, the recent 3.000 dead Christians in Syria and Iraq, and the mutilated bodies of raped women, and bloody babies, shrugging their relativist shoulders and moaning 'what about the Crusades?' Geniuses.
According to the 'Enlightenment thinkers', starting with the redoubtably ignorant Petrarch, all was 'Dark' and opaque before 1550. Then suddenly, magically, the world of 'science', 'evolved' and man was freed. Thanks to Islam, Voltaire and Darwin, mankind's rationality was enabled, casting off 2000 years of oppression, fear, superstition and dirty stupidity. Which is why of course during said period, there were such monumental achievements as hospitals, eye glasses, chimneys, the blast furnace, science, math, public schools, art, polyphonic music, orchestras....
Brunelleschi's early 15th century dome in Florence is yet another example of unparalleled genius in the Middle Ages. Of course the 'Renaissance' claims this to be their own, as if this period of development was divorced from, and antagonistic to, what came before it. For the phase theologians of the not-so-Enlightened period; the time frames of the Middle Ages are very fluid indeed. Giotto's 3-D artwork from the early 14th century, along with Dante and sundry technologies such as wind-mills, are routinely categorized as part of the 'Renaissance'. Such fraudulent posturing is called 'factual'.
Brunelleschi’s Florentine dome, started in 1419, is situated firmly within the Medieval period, an era of great progress and wealth creation; and is the largest masonry dome ever built and is an astonishing 45 meters wide. It was created in part to supersede Justinian's enormous 6th century dome in the Haggia Sophia in Constantinople. The complexity of the project was staggering and it took more than 100 years from the original idea in 1296, to 1419, to start the affair. In fact even today, we don't fully understand how Brunelleschi achieved his masterpiece.
“Perhaps the most haunting mystery is the simplest of all: How did Brunelleschi and his masons position each brick, stone beam, and other structural element with such precision inside the vastly complex cathedral—a task that modern architects with their laser levels, GPS positioning devices, and CAD software would still find challenging today?”
Brunelleschi's dome was built squarely in the Middle Ages. But don't expert to hear 'experts' and quackademics admit that fact. They will simply move the 1419 project to the 'Renaissance'. Anything to avoid the obvious and anything to inure the cult of the Enlightenment from criticism.
History of the Dome is here
When you hear ignoramuses discuss a 'Dark Age', ask them if they meant Byzantium, a city and empire which is the longest lived in history – 1131 years – and which was very Christian. From its inception in 324 AD until 1453 AD, Byzantium might have been the richest city in world history, with its collection of gold, silver, art, literature and precious artifacts without precedent. Maybe the brain-washed liberal arts major can explain how a Christian empire could have been so long-lived and produced the following in a 'Dark Age':
-Largest city on the planet for 1000 years – Constantinople, Moslem propaganda notwithstanding. [Constantinople contained about 1 million, a claim Moslems made for Cordoba pop. 50.000, and Baghdad, pop. 200.000].
-The most innovative and exquisite Cathedral until the Gothic period; the Haggia Sophia, which was the largest masonry project in world history outside of Herod's 2nd Temple; and contains the largest dome ever built until Florence in the 15th century (but remember it was a dark age in Florence as well in 1400...)
-World's first university dating from the early 5th century was established at Constantinople.
-World's first public school system dates from about 400 AD in Byzantium.
-Constantinople was the largest marble-building site in world history. The city is literally built from the same marble stone, and all of the city's buildings were erected from an island quarry named Marmara. No other city was built from marble on such a scale.
-Byzantium erected the largest aqueducts ever built, carrying water from 150 miles away, some aqueduct bridges are 90 feet high. These dwarf anything the Western Romans built.
-Underground sewers along with enormous water storage facilities were created – for the first time in history in Constantinople. Cisterns below the city held enough water for many years of usage – all fed by natural springs 150 miles away.
-Byzantine art and architecture influenced the civilized world and greatly influenced the art and architecture of Western Europe, Russia, the Near East, and even Iran and China.
-A codex of laws, diplomatic rules and regulations, and policies governing inter-state relations were developed in Byzantium and used by other empires and states.
-Astrolabe, architectural innovations, astronomy, Greek and Roman learning and sundry other inventions were carried from Byzantium to every part of its extensive trade route.
-Ptolemy’s Almagest which laid out a Greek and Christian view of a spherical earth at the centre of the universe, and which calculated the earth's circumference along with literally thousands of important astronomical observations found its way into Western society through Byzantium.
-Greek-fire was a unique and highly effective Byzantine invention. Many other military inventions including the Trebuchet [a gravity inspired heavy object/missile launcher dating from the 6th century]; influenced Western military technology.
The Byzantine empire had mortal weaknesses which led to its final demise. Most of these centered around the ills of despotism, centralized governance, over-taxation, bureaucratic corruption; and a belief, common to all major empires; that they were the centre of the world and that their world would never end.
Despite these weaknesses there is little doubt that this rich, successful, advanced and culturally supreme Christian empire, was the most important centre of learning, the arts, culture and trade for 1000 years. There is a very good argument to make, that without Byzantium's influence and indeed its wealth post the 1204 Crusader sacking of Constantinople, that Western Europe may not have developed modern civilization. The critical aspect of Byzantium was the fact it was Christian, and this world-view of Christianity allowed the Eastern Greek Romans to create a cultural colossus that impacted history and furthered the development of mankind. So much for the 'Dark Ages'.
Mainstream/Lamebain media view of Islam. ISIS, Hamas, Hizbollah, Al Qaeda et al are 'fringe extremists' corrupting a 'religion'. If you study what these groups say, they are simply implementing Koranic law, that is to say, they are holding true and fast to what the founder of the moon cult named Submission demanded. Muhammad's screed of supremacism, racism, violence and madness is no different than other communal creeds of Jihad and endless war, such as Nazism, or Communism. Witness the vapidity of a leading 'conservative' newspaper, the WSJ, and its op-ed on ISIS:
“But now, after months of graphic violence and crude propaganda, and after Foley's beheading, the nature, threat and intentions of ISIS have become clear. This week the president sent bombers. There were no demonstrations in protest. Even the pope didn't protest. To stop violent aggressors, Francis noted when asked about the U.S. bombings, is "licit." He did not explicitly support bombing, but noted the stopping of groups such as ISIS was justifiable.
Historian Louise Adena wrote the following about Byzantium and its impact on the West:
“The Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire with Constantinople at its heart was established at the beginning of the fourth century AD by the Roman Emperor Constantine (272-337AD). While it remained a major world cultural and commercial centre for over 1000 years, it has been only during the twentieth century that European historians have come to acknowledge its profound influence on Western Europe. Its enduring legacies are seen in European art and legal systems. It was also key to the widespread adoption of Christianity in Europe; it was the base for the spread of learning in Europe providing continuity between ancient Greek and Roman civilisations and into the European Renaissance.” [Bold emphasis is mine]
The Eastern Roman empire, suffused in Greek and Near Eastern language and culture, is certainly one of history's forgotten empires. Along with Western Church canon law, some remnants of Roman Law, Byzantium certainly helped shaped Western legal jurisprudence and its impact is still in evidence today. Under Emperor Justinian (482-565AD) the Eastern Roman empire compiled laws and legislation into one legal code - the ‘Codex Justinianus’. This codex compiled into one extant form, all of the state's laws which the citizens would be obliged to follow.
This idea whilst not entirely revolutionary, was profound. It introduced the legal concept of innocent-until-proven-guilty, which relied on proof, witnesses, a due process and common-sense. Justinian's codex is therefore one of the main planks of our modern legal system, equalizing all citizens before an impartial set of laws, and ostracizing the baleful influence of wealth and power over proper legal proceedings and decisions.
In the development of civilization, an often overlooked contributor was the Roman-Greek empire of Byzantium. The influences of Byzantium affected Western art, architecture, military technology, philosophy and even medicine. Justinian the Serbian peasant and Byzantine Tsar in 535 AD onwards, initiated a series of wars to reclaim Western Roman territory which devastated Italy and North Africa, weakening both areas for generations. In the Byzantine mind, the Western Roman empire, which had splintered into 3 Germanic kingdoms and various petty Lordships; belonged to the Eastern Roman empire.
The Moslems plundered Byzantium both literally and figuratively, and it is from the Eastern Roman empire that all of the Islamic architecture is derived. Indeed Byzantine Christian slaves and dhimmis were vital in the management of various Caliphates, the teaching of Greek and Roman literature and learning to Moslems; the translation of essential ideas and works ranging from astronomy to medicaments; and of course the architecting of sundry Mosques. The Grand Mosque in Cordoba uses the columns, arches and layout of various temples, public buildings and bath houses found in Constantinople.
Eastern Rome before the time of the Moslem invasions had become rich. But it also had become mystical, bureaucratic, ossified, and out of date. It was rigid. The fact that remnants of the Eastern Roman empire survived until 1453 and the Moslem eradication of Constantinople [40.000 killed, 30.000 enslaved]; is a remarkable testimony, however, to its former power, importance and organization. What Eastern Rome needed was the Western 'renaissance' which occurred after the Western Roman empire thankfully went out of business. Both empires outlived their usefulness and their utility, especially regarding the lives of ordinary people, and the further development of civilization including its spiritual component.
An excellent one volume study of Byzantium is by Julius Norwich. Though in need of repair the Moslem destruction of this civilization was a tragedy.
“Byzantine's collapse was for many reasons, an inevitability. Nevertheless its destruction is one of the greatest tragedies in history. The Turkish takeover of Constantinople and the destruction of a noble, intelligent and complicated culture did nothing to advance civilisation. In the place of Greek and Roman learning, there was erected a primitive, expansive and aggressive Islamic cult and empire – shut off from inquiry, science and spiritual tolerance and dedicated to imperialism. We see the results today in the failed Islamic states which gird the globe from North Africa to Pakistan. This might have been Europe's fate as well - if not for Byzantium.”
The Middle Ages was an era of enormous artistic output. Archaeology has only revealed a small tithe of what existed. Plunder, destruction, theft and lost treasure unfortunately impoverish our modern understanding of the artistic impulse of this period. Likely no more than 2% of what was produced from 500-1000 AD has been recovered. But even this fractional amount reveals an astonishing society of wealth, culture and creativity.
A good history of Anglo-Saxon and early Anglo-Saxon English art can be found here.
Witness the genius of this Anglo-Saxon shoulder clasp: possibly the highest standard of European jewellery art ever found. Not until modern kilns were developed could reproductions of what lies buried at Sutton be made, such was the intricacy of this and other artifacts. Only a sophisticated, wealthy, active and industrializing society, could produce Anglo-Saxon art.
The oldest surviving example of a stained glass window, which reaches back into the time of the 7th century rests in Jarrow England. The English historian Bede would have seen this particular display of genius. Stained glass manufacture is incredibly complicated. No other society in the world developed this art form.
“Glass is made by fusing together some form of silica such as sand, an alkali such as potash or soda, and lime or lead oxide. The color is produced by adding a metallic oxide to the raw materials. Copper oxide, under different conditions, produces ruby, blue, or green colors in glass. Cobalt is usually used to produce most shades of blues. Green shades can also be obtained from the addition of chromium and iron oxide. Golden glass is sometimes colored with uranium, cadmium sulfide, or titanium, and there are fine selenium yellows as well as vermilions. Ruby colored glass is made by adding gold.”
But remember all was dark. No light shone. Only Islam, Galileo and Voltaire would stand athwart the path to the abyss.....which is why Moslems never produced art to match Sutton Hoo or a stained glass window and Voltaire et al could not replicate the processes of discovery to make something as intricate or redoubtable as a Sutton Hoo bracelet. This is why they were so enlightened.
Show me the Moslem equivalent.
The Lindisfarne gospels were created in the late 7th century by Catholic monks in their north-eastern England retreat. One monk in particular Eadfrith, is credited with the astonishing artwork, without precedent in Europe. Next to the Book of Kells [see here], the decorated Lindisfarne manuscript laid out on vellum, elaborately furnished with intricate artwork of staggering detail, is one of the world's greatest works of art. It stands along with the Book of Kells as an unrivalled testimony to religion and civilization. Dedicated to the 4 gospel writers, this middle-ages manifest is a dedication to beauty, truth, awareness and supreme culture. It combines the essence of European art with a distinctly Anglo-Saxon skill and view of the world.
An audio and book translation can be found here.
“The Lindisfarne Gospels, one of the most magnificent manuscripts of the early Middle Ages, was written and decorated at the end of the 7th century by the monk Eadfrith, who became Bishop of Lindisfarne in 698 and died in 721. Its original leather binding, long since lost, was made by Ethelwald, who succeeded Eadfrith as bishop, and was decorated with jewels and precious metals later in the 8th century by Billfrith the Anchorite. The Latin text of the Gospels is translated word by word in an Old English gloss, the earliest surviving example of the Gospel text in any form of the English language, it was added between the lines in the mid 10th century by Aldred, Provost of Chester-le-Street. Today the manuscript is once again bound in silver and jewels, in covers made in 1852 at the expense of Edward Maltby, Bishop of Durham. The design is based on motifs drawn from the decoration of the manuscript itself....”
But remember, before sundry fat and ignorant atheists such as Gibbon, Diderot, Voltaire or Hume, or the fraud of all trades Galileo, Europe stank in a 'dark age'. Superstition and stupidity reigned, art and society had collapsed. Nothing of value was manufactured. Only Islam kept the candle of civilization burning.....and all awaited the grand entrance of the 17th century and the age of science [along with witch-burning, abiogenesis, the occult, Puritanism, Spanish insolvency, the 30 years war to control Germany...].
So the propaganda tells us.
Partial list of Moslem assaults just against US assets, citizens or territory. By all means live in the fiction that the cult of Muhammad is peace and love. Let's juxtapose this list against the 'terror' incidents incited by Catholics – all zero of them. Source and bold highlights are mine.
Tarek Fatah is a Canadian Moslem – sort of - who is deeply worried about a 'parallel' Moslem state developing in Canada, full of Moslem civilization including the slaughter of daughters, 3 wives, bedsheets for female slaves and chattel, and the requisite beheading of Jews and Christians. All in the name of the Multi-culti that everyone is so in love with. Diversity and all that.
He wrote a book some time ago, laughing at the idea of a Moslem Caliphate. It was entitled 'Chasing a Mirage'. I reviewed it and he was none to pleased about my comments. Today however, I doubt that 2.500 dead Christians in Iraq and Syria during the past few months would believe ISIS' Caliphate is a mirage. 45 Churches and counting, thousands of dead Christians, many more raped and exiled, all by Moslems from ISIS which is after all, only implementing Koranic law.
My review of Fatah's book included the obvious observation:
“Fatah is a devout Muslim and earnestly believes that Islamic faith in its benign form is compatible with Western civilisation. On this and many other points in his book he is wrong. The importance of his book is that he presents a historical and world view which demands Muslim reform and a rejection of extremist political Islam. On this issue hangs the future balance of Western-Muslim relations. It is up to Muslims to reform their ideology.”
Moslems will never reform Islam. It is incompatible with human civilization. There is no Carolingian-12th century Renaissance within Islam. There is no 10th-14th century explosion of technology, science, and real-world applicability to theology. There is no development of faith leading to reason; and reason being used to justify faith. For Moslems and the Koran it is violence, coercion, hate, hell-fire for the Infidel, and the declamation obtained from Muhammad, to crucify and execute the Jews, Christians and the insufficiently pious Moslem [5:33].
As I remarked whilst reviewing his book:
“Islam is of course an ideology, not a faith. This is something that Fatah a practicing Muslim would reject. But at least he and others can recognise the inherent fascistic intolerance and will to rule embedded in the Koran and in political Islam. Fatah is simply sick to death of the intolerant elements of his 'faith'. His book is an attempt to wake up Muslims to the extremist agendas being fostered not only on Muslims, but also on non-Muslims within the West. Fundamentalist Islam is alive and doing very well within Western states. Wahabbist, neo-Salafist, and Anti-Semitic doctrines are common place throughout Mosques in the West. Few Muslims bother to criticise these practices and fewer still will do anything to try and reform their so-called 'faith'. What kind of ideology is without a reformation, self criticism or searching analysis ? Is it a faith or an intolerant cult ?
Fatah sums up the intolerant nature of Islam: "You have been lied to for centuries. Muslims need to educate themselves about Islam, not proselytize their religion to non-Muslims. It is time for them to read the truth about Islamic history......They should stop glorifying the politicization of Islam, a phenomenon which has produced a panaroma of tragedies and bloodshed..."
ISIS and the new Caliphate is the manifestation of true Islam. ISIS and Islam are both without borders. The Moslem Caliphate like spilt water on a flat surface, will continue to spread until confronted by obstacles and immovable forces. The Western world is certainly not going to do anything to slow down the expansion of this new Caliphate.
The Koran openly plagiarizes – poorly it should be said – much of the Torah. Judaic theology is thus corrupted for Muhammadan usage. The same is true of the Moslem plunder of the Christian gospel, attempted perhaps at a lesser rate than that of the Old Testament. There are 2 important points to consider in the Moslem corruption of the Christian texts and their inclusion in the gibberish of the Koran.
The first is that part of Muhammad's band of brigands at one time fled to Christian Ethiopia where, in good Christian fashion, they were ironically protected from their Meccan persecutors. Christians would be accorded no such tolerance by Muhammadans of course as the cult of Mecca would soon begin a 1400 Jihad of Christian slaughter and rape. In Ethiopia the Moslems or Muhammadans would have picked up scraps and bits of the Gospel. Being illiterate, their recounting of such verses was bound to be imprecise and garbled. Their bards and those who helped inform the Koran, would have supplied this apocryphal text.
Secondly, there existed in Muhammad's Arabia, quite a few 'heretical' Christian sects. Mary worship and even idolatory was widespread. Other forms of perverted Christianity were also rife. There was no 'Catholic' ideal of Christianity as presented today. Christian theology was riven and disputed. The cult of Muhammad invariably would have come into contact with these heretical sects and would have appropriated their incorrect ideas about the Christian faith into their own belief systems. The Koran is in the main after-all, a statement of supremacy, as to why the Jewish and Christian faiths are incorrect and immoral; and why the Koran and Muhammadism is the only 'correct' view of theology.
The Muhammadans incorporated many Christian superstitions into the Koran, wrongly believing them to be true Gospel. Few Christians who actually understood the veracity of the Gospels converted to the Muhammad's cult. By 632 AD most Christians in Arabia, were either dead or exiled. Some of Muhammad's sex-slaves, Mary the Copt for example, were within the Moslem cult; and most likely had some appreciation of the true nature of the gospel. But their influence was marginal and temporary. What enters the Koran is the superstition and invalidated forms of cultish-Christian belief, which were common in the various sects which populated Muhammadan Arabia. The true gospel never makes an appearance to either Muhammad or his Koranic scribblers.
[From Goldsack, Chapter 3, on the Gospels in the Koran]
“that many other of the doctrines of the Qur'an such as the denial of the death of Christ, the resolving the Christian Trinity into a tri-theism consisting of the Father, the Son and the Virgin Mary were derived by Muhammad from the Gnostic and other heretical sects of Christians who flourished in Arabia in his time....much of the Qur'an can be traced to Apocryphal Christian sources; whilst the Christian reader will also perceive how false is the claim that the former "confirms" the preceding scriptures - the Taurat and Injil..”
This is why the Christian gospel is so mis-shapened, mal-formed and degraded within Mein Koran.
Anglican Reverend Forster who wrote an informative work on Mahomet or Muhammad  was no friend of the Catholics. He devotes an entire chapter – in good English Anglican tradition and exaggeration – on the tyranny of 'Popery'. As deluded as Weber's “Protestant Work Ethic”, in which 1000 years of Medieval invention and change is studiously ignored, or Gibbon's claim that Christianity 'pacified' Rome and caused its 'Fall'. Rome never fell, it was carved up into 3 Germanic kingdoms, and it died a thankful and belated death due to civil war, inflation, bureaucracy, taxation and corruption. The benefits of despotic governance that everyone seems so besotted by in the 21rst century.
Forster quotes Church-hater Gibbon in assessing the cult of Muhammad. Basically Gibbon rightly observes that Mahometism is a debased, degraded form of uncivilized cult worship, devoid of anything uplifting or intelligent.
The cult uber alles.
Forster also goes to pains to show that Mahometism simply stole from the Bible. Much of the garbled gibberish that makes up the Koran is a warped regurgitation of what is found in the holy book. One example amongst hundreds suffices in which Paul's Chapter 12 in Corinthians 1, is bastardized and parodied within the Koran, obviously by scribes who were unfamiliar with the actual content.
The actual text of Paul's letter is here. It bears no resemblance to the Jihadic utterance above which is a threat against both the Jews and Christians.
Forster rightly condemns Mahometism for what it truly is – a cult of violence, plagiarism, illogicality, hate and war. I doubt he would be invited to polite dinner parties in today's multicultural, Islamophiliac London.
The Koran, Muhammad's madness named 'Recital', is mainly composed of two parts. The first is the vast pillaging from the Bible, usually incorrectly, and with attribution to HuBaal the Lord moon deity of Mecca. Local Bedouin poems and verses, long in existence, were also appropriated en masse and thrown as a jumble-mash into the Koran. The short 'Suras' are evidence of this. The second purpose of the Koran is to demand obeisance and slavery to Muhammad [in the name of HuBaal], whilst demonizing the untermensch Jew and Christian. 1600 verses of hate speech attest t this fact.
Forster in his work, Mahometanism: A Study, discusses Koranic plagiarism, which is so rife and obvious, that only Moslems and Phd Marxist Academics in Western lower-education schools could miss it, he writes:
“..among the many marks discernible in the Koran of designed and studied plagiarism from the Scripture.”
You don't need to be an evangelical crank to make this claim. Forster goes on to list page after page the plagiarism of the Koran.
Western 'experts' deem theft the highest form of revealed theological truth.
The Koran has nothing in common with either the Old or New Testament. It is of course quite similar in its dichotomous language and vicious system of punishment, to many ancient Bronze and early Iron age theologies. Given that ancient Arabia was culturally colonized by Babylonia, giving rise to the Babylonian Sin or Baal as the main Lord [allah] of Mecca; and the first Babylonian codex the system of 'an for an eye' [Sura 5:45] which is the mainstay of Sharia [along with stoning, crucifying, cutting off of limbs], the linkages between Bronze Age Mesopotamia with the wastelands of the Bedouin should not be a surprise.
The Old Testament is composed of 3 essential parts. The first are the laws, the thou-shalls and the shall nots, which are unique in world history. Parables and wisdom from Psalms, Sirach, Job and Proverbs reinforce proper attributes and virtue. The second is the most accurate history imaginable of the Bronze and Iron ages, as proven by archaeology and non Biblical extant literature, a compendium of life, kings, wars and empires; not to mention the geological proof of a global flood. The third part is that of prophecy and the visions, predictions and laments of the prophets, with much vivid suffering, soul-searching and questioning of divine intent. Jeremiah and Isiah are classic exemplars of this genre.
The Koran certainly has no similarity with the New Testament. The golden rule never makes an appearance in the Koran, and the examples of Christ and Muhammad are polar opposites, with Muhammad very much in the role as the antithesis or anti-Christ, in his actions, words and blood soaked life. There might be a passing similarity between the Koran and the Old Testament. But this is also facetious and inaccurate.
The Koran purloins Old Testament tracts, especially the life of Moses, usually misunderstanding the original text, corrupting it, and deciding that in any event the story simply supports the omniscience and power of the Meccan HuBaal [Allah]. While the plagiarism is rife, the Koranic theft of Old Testament material means that the thieves were not adequately acquainted with the subject matter.
The only similarity one can see in reading Mein Koran and the Old Testament is the list of do's and do not's. But here the difference is stark. In the Old Testament the Hebrews, who are supposed to be the priests for God, in their zeal to disobey and worship idols, or ignore the commandments, are routinely punished for their misdeeds and unbelief. The prophets spend a great deal of energy and activity in trying to force the lost Hebrew sheep back to the good shepherd; or to issue forth declamations of disaster if repentance is not soon at hand. In any event the subject matter is the conduct of Hebrews, and those who should be following God; and what will happen if the Lord is rejected.
The Koran is entirely dissimilar. The history is meagre and disjointed. There are no prophets. The injunctions of woe are directed solely at Jews, Christian, unbelievers as well as those Moslems who are not following the Koran closely enough. The most important theme of the Koran is that Moslems must faithfully and completely follow the Koran and Muhammad's demands. Non-Moslems are to be destroyed both in this life by Moslems; and shall be tortured and committed to hell-fire by HuBaal or Allah in the next. Yet the Koran is also quite clear that Moslems must be nice to fellow cult members. It is expected that all Moslems will eventually, fully return to the totalitarian dogma of the Koran and Sharia.
The Old Testament's legal code is of course not the same as the Koran's. The 'eye for an eye' comes out of Babylon and is the mainstay of Moslem judicial procedure. This is why there is still widespread in the Moslem world such absurd physical violence and death in contravention of Koranic-Sharia law. Nothing has changed since 1750 BC Babylon. In the Old Testament this Bronze Age devotion to violence as a just punishment, is superseded by the 10 commands of Moses. Violence is still apparent – stoning, and even death for Christ and others who are claimed to be false prophets or who break the code of the Temple – but this is tempered in comparison with the blood demanded by Moslem Sharia.
Thankfully the New Testament abrogates the violence of the Old, by demanding a new vision of the human, the ending of blood in resolving disputes, and the sanctity of life, even of those condemned. You will never see the articles of the New Testament within the Bronze Age legal codex of Islam. Never.
When Moslems invade, conquer, or settle en-masse in a given area, infidel monuments are eradicated. Churches, artwork, libraries, the Twin Towers, or any artifice which expresses a prominent and important non-Koranic view of the world is disposed of. When the Moslem Jihad irrupted in its fascist zeal in 632 AD from the uncivilized wastes of moon-worshipping Bedouin country, and spread like a cancer from Syria to Southern France, some 30.000 churches were pulled-down, or converted into mosques. Today 'intellectuals' with Phd's would define such atrocity as an expression of inter-faith harmony and a 'golden age' of Moslem architecture.
In another article I have listed a partial account of Moslem annihilation of Infidel shrines. Many more could be added. Two of the holiest Christian sites in history were used by Moslems – the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, and the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. The latter is now a museum.
Academics and 'experts' have determined that demolishing shrines, charging ransom to enter the rebuilt [at your cost] pilgrimage site, and converting sacred structures into mosques whose work is performed by second-class Jewish and Christian slaves, manifests a wonderfully tolerant and open society, devoid of hate and bile.
Today in Iraq we have just around Mosul and stretching out to the West and South, at least 45 churches destroyed by the Moslem Fascists ISIS. Not a word in the main-stream media. Nary a demonstration anywhere in the world, by 'moderate' Moslems declaiming against the eradication of Christianity in its ancient heartland. I would guess that most Moslems are proud, happy, drenched in a supremacist neo-Nazi glow of inviolate glory; as their cult follows Sura 5:33:
“The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.”
You won't hear 'experts' and academics repeat the above Jihadic refrain, even as Moslems kill, execute, humiliate and crucify Christians.
Why do Moslems murder Christians? Too many are ignorant of the Meccan cult's impetus and energy. The question is answered by Moslem liturgy and its founder; and is expressed in a 1400 year Jihad by the cult of Submission against 'People of the Book' – the competitors to Muhammadism. As with Jews, Christians can only be tolerated if they submit to their Moslem masters. The superiority of Christianity in both theological and civilizational terms cannot be tolerated by Moslems. There is no desire for accommodation or harmony within the cult of Mecca.
Islam is the construct of Fuehrer worship, in which the Meccan Baal known as the Lord or ilah of the Arab tribes; is conflated with, and at times in the Koran replaced by, the personage of Muhammad. As with Hitler, Stalin and other evolutionists, atheist or fascist-totalitarian leaders, total control was the key objective of Muhammad's program. Rape, killing, plunder, sex-slavery, polygamy, and accruing gold and silver were the main concerns in the lust for complete power. All the easier to pay off brigands and thugs who follow the program – the mercenaries of the cult. Ethics do not make an appearance in the book Recital [Koran], unless you believe that being nice to Moslems and 'ruthless' to non-Moslems is an ethical code. The only 'nice' phrases about Jews and Christians [about half a dozen]; are linked to their complete submission to Moslems. Juxtaposed against this are 1600 verses of hate speech against the 'inferior apes and pigs' of the 'Book'.
Sura 79 in the Koran for example is titled 'Tearing out'. Tearing out what you might ask ? The weeds of Christ's parable of the seed ? Tearing out our prejudices and egos? Tearing out Christ's log from our own eye ? Tearing out the demons which possess our flesh ? Of course not. For Moslems you tear out the hearts of Christians and Jews. If the average Moslem, raised in the usual illiterate, non-culture of a deformed Moslem society reads Sura 79 they naturally assume that 'god' has pre-ordained the destruction of Jews and Christians. So why not kill them ?
If you don't believe in the Lord Allah, doom is upon you.
Allah will give 'recompense' to the Jews and Christians who rejected the word of Muhammad:
Transgression in Islam simply means to disobey Muhammadan or Koranic-Sharia law. That is it. It does not mean 'transgressing' an ethical code. None exists in the Koran to transgress. Koranic-Muhammadan law is simple: follow whatever Muhammad says and does. Period. For Jews and Christians not doing so means that angels will rip out your hearts. To the average Moslem this 'godly command' surely gives them license to kill the hated Jew and Christian ?
In both the confessing and evangelical Churches there are too many brain-dead apologists for the Meccan cult of death, dedicated as it is, to the complete eradication of Christianity. The rot in the confessing and professing Church starts at the top in the Vatican and streams down in great waves to the local clergy. The entire structure is terrified to criticize Muhammad's cult. Supine, stupid and stunned they gape while hundreds of thousands of Christians in the birthplace of their religion are being lined up for a faith-genocide by Moslems.
A report on Christians in Iraq and in particular Mosul, from Catholic.org. Deacon Keith Fournier is Founder and Chairman of Common Good Foundation and Common Good Alliance. A married Roman Catholic Deacon of the Diocese of Richmond, Virginia, he and his wife Laurine have five grown children and six grandchildren, He serves as the Director of Adult Faith Formation at St. Stephen, Martyr Parish in Chesapeake, VA. He is also a human rights lawyer and public policy advocate.
taking over Mosul on June 10, ISIS has destroyed, occupied, converted
to mosques, converted to ISIS headquarters or shuttered all 45
Christian institutions in Mosul.The
following is the complete list of the Christian institutions in
Mosul, grouped by denomination.
Syriac Catholic Church:
1.Syrian Catholic Diocese - Maidan Neighborhood, Mosul
2.The Old Church of the Immaculate - Maidan Neighborhood, Mosul (The church goes back to the eighth century AD)
3.The New Church of the Immaculate - Maidan Neighborhood
4.Church of Mar (Saint) Toma - Khazraj Neighborhood
5.Museum of Mar (Saint) Toma - Khazraj Neighborhood
6.Church of Our Lady of the Annunciation - Muhandiseen Neighborhood
7.Church of the Virgin of Fatima - Faisaliah Neighborhood
8.Our Lady of Deliverance Chapel - Shifaa Neighborhood
9.The House of the Young Sisters of Jesus - Ras Al-Kour Neighborhood
10.Archbishop's Palace Chapel - Dawasa Neighborhood
Syriac Orthodox Church:
1.Syrian Orthodox Archdiocese - Shurta Neighborhood
2.The Antiquarian Church of Saint Ahodeeni - Bab AlJadeed Neighborhood
3.Mar (Saint) Toma Church and cemetery, (the old Bishopric) - Khazraj Neighborhood
4.Church of The Immaculate (Castle) - Maidan Neighborhood
5.Church of The Immaculate - Shifaa Neighborhood
6.Mar (Saint) Aprim Church - Shurta Neighborhood
7.St. Joseph Church - The New Mosul Neighborhood
Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East:
1.Diocese of the Assyrian Church of the East - Noor Neighborhood
2.Assyrian Church of the East, Dawasa Neighborhood
3.Church of the Virgin Mary (old rite) - Wihda Neighborhood
Chaldean Church of Babylon:
1.Chaldean Diocese - Shurta Neighborhood
2.Miskinta Church - Mayassa Neighborhood
3.The Antiquarian Church of Shimon alSafa - Mayassa Neighborhood
4.Church of Mar (Saint) Buthyoon - Shahar AlSouq Neighborhood
5.Church of St. Ephrem, Wady AlAin Neighborhood
6.Church of St. Paul - Majmooaa AlThaqafiya District
7.The Old Church of the Immaculate (with the bombed archdiocese)- Shifaa Neighborhood
8.Church of the Holy Spirit - Bakir Neighborhood
9.Church of the Virgin Mary - Drakziliya Neighborhood
10.Ancient Church of Saint Isaiah and Cemetery - Ras AlKour Neighborhood
11.Mother of Aid Church - Dawasa Neighborhood
12.The Antiquarian Church of St. George- Khazraj Neighborhood
13.St. George Monastery with Cemetery - Arab Neighborhood
14.Monastery of AlNasir (Victory) - Arab Neighborhood
15.Convent of the Chaldean Nuns - Mayassa Neighborhood
16.Monastery of St. Michael - Hawi Church Neighborhood
17.The Antiquarian Monastery of St. Elijah - Ghazlany Neighborhood
Armenian Orthodox Church:
1.Armenian Church - Maidan Neighborhood
2.The New Armenian Church - Wihda Neighborhood
Evangelical Presbyterian Church:
1.Evangelical Presbyterian Church - Mayassa Neighborhood
1.Latin Church and Monastery of the Dominican Fathers and Convent of Katrina Siena Nuns - Sa'a Neighborhood
2.Convent of the Dominican Sisters, - Mosul AlJadeed Neighborhood
3.Convent of the Dominican Sisters (AlKilma Monastery) - Majmooaa AlThaqafiya District
4.House of Qasada AlRasouliya (Apostolic Aim) (Institute of St. John the Beloved)
1.Christian Cemetery in the Ekab Valley which contains a small chapel.
All courtesy of Islam, the cult of death.
Moslem fascism embedded in its liturgical books, demands the absolute destruction of Jews and Christians. If you read Muhammadan theology for yourself, separated from lame-brain media brainwashing, and public school disinformation; this fact will make itself present in a most sickening and virulent manner. Consider some of the 'commentaries' or Hadiths, which run alongside Mein Koran, by Moslem 'theologians' [ie cult propagandists], such as Ishaq and Tabari.
Ishaq was an early 8th century propagandist for the Abbasid totalitarianism, named by some as a 'Caliphate'. He wrote the first biography of Fuehrer Muhammad, who in the eyes of the moon deity Allah, was the man uber-alles. Born some 75 years or so after the mad-man's death, Ishaq put together accounts of Muhammad's actions during his reign of terror, from second-hand sources. It makes unpleasant reading.
"Do you love Jews and their religion, you liver-hearted ass, and not Muhammad? Their religion will never march with ours.... Jews make false professions about Islam. So Allah sent down: 'Satan wishes to lead them astray."
"Allah increases their sickness. A tormented doom awaits the Jews. Allah said, 'They are mischief makers. They are fools. The Jews deny the truth and contradict what the Apostle has brought. I will mock them and let them continue to wander blindly.'"
Tabari, applauded by big-brains as the 'most important Moslem historian ever', was a mid-9th century Moslem who extended the Hadith commentaries. As Shakespeare was a Tudor propagandist, so too was Tabari a product of his times and his 'history' is nothing less than a fictional recitation of Moslem supremacy [much of Shakespeare should be viewed in the same vein].
Below are some verses from Ishaq and Tabari related to the Jews as viewed by Moslems and Muhammad. Notice the bile, the hate, the intolerance, the lust for their destruction.
Next we will hear that Nazi theological apologist Rosenberg, was 'a great historian'.
"A notable Jew spoke to the Apostle, twisting his tongue. He attacked Islam and reviled it, so Allah sent down, 'Allah knows best about your enemies. Some of the Jews change words from their contexts and say: "We hear and disobey," twisting their tongues and attacking the religion so Allah cursed them.'"
"Ali struck the Jew with a swift blow that split his helmet, neck protector, and head, landing in his rear teeth. And the Muslims entered the city. Muhammad conquered the [Jewish] neighborhood. Safiyah was brought to him, and another woman with her. Bilal led them past some of the Jews we had slain including the woman's dead husband. When she saw them, the woman with Safiyah cried out, slapped her face, and poured dust on her head. When Allah's Prophet saw her, he said, 'Take this she-devil away from me!'"
"The Messenger said during his final illness, 'Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying: 'Allah has given permission for you to be expelled; for I have received word that the Prophet said that two religions cannot coexist in Arabia."
"Khaybar [Jewish oasis town] was stormed by the Apostle's squadron, fully armed, powerful, and strong. It brought certain humiliation with Muslim men in its midst. We attacked and they met their doom. Muhammad conquered the Jews in fighting that day as they opened their eyes to our dust."
"We cannot accept the oaths of Jews. Their infidelity is so great they swear falsely."
"The Jews were made to come down, and Allah's Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men."
"The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims."
Much more exists in the 'histories' of Tabari and Ishaq related to hate speech, Jihad, and the murdering of Jews and Christians. At least we can thank them for their frank honesty. We can see that Muhammad murdered Jews with military might, trickery, his own hands and slaughtered innocents, whilst raping Jewish women. Moslems and their devoted multi-cult minions characterize such actions as 'religious', 'prophetic', and 'ethical'. What a pathetic group of brain-addled morons they must be.
The Allah thing - aka Muhammad - hates Christians Koranic supremacism.
Christianophobia – Islam
"Christians must choose "Islam or death," while their women and daughters may legitimately be regarded as wives of Muslims" The enemedia's criminal silence on the relentless and bloody march of Islamic surpremacists on the backs and the bodies...
Answering the cult from a Christian perspective: What to say to Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormans, The New Age and others.
Idiots Guide to Islam http://alrassoolilive.blogspot.com/
Christianophobia – Islam
Christianophobia – Islam
Raping and torturing young girls.....isn't that what all intolerant cults do ?
It's time to wake up. The real muslims are the terrorist who are following the teachings within the quran. We are not the one's who say they are killing in t...
Nearly two years after the “Arab Spring” began in Egypt, the nation’s Muslim Brotherhood president has arrogated to himself dictatorial powers, and is ramming through a new constitution that will effectively extinguish the last vestiges of Egyptian democracy and establish Egypt as a Sharia state. Just as I said back in January 2011, when the uprisings against Mubarak began, for the people in Egypt who had real power to affect change, the “Arab Spring” was never about democracy and pluralism, despite the ululations of the Western press; it was always about imposing Islamic law upon Egypt. And now, with the new constitution, here we are.
These are not the regular beatings and vandalism against Christians, Hindus and Buddhists but religion-oriented attacks in which someone dies at the hand of a member of the”religion of peace.”
Have you done your shopping yet? It’s Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month — what better time to buy a bomb vest for the mujahid you love?
Inspired by a remark from Pat Condell in this video, I have proclaimed December to be Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month. After all, November was Islamophobia Awareness Month, and certainly the hatred and violence in the Qur’an kills many, many more people than “Islamophobia” ever has or ever will, and so it is far more deserving than “Islamophobia” of a month of its own.
Sura 2 or the Heifer is one of the last 'revelatory' chapters given by the archangel Gabriel to Muhammad, on behalf of the former family deity and moon idol Hub'Al, recast by Muhammad as the monotheistic Al-Lah or 'The One'. Fully half of this Sura is Christianophobic and Judeo-ophobic. Quite an amount from a cult dedicated, as the one-world wonders inform us, to love and tolerance.
Jihad (holy fighting in Allah's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know.
And fight in the Way of Allah and know that Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower.
How many Moslems actually dislike Jihad ? Many, most, the majority ? seem to support it. The most important duty a pious Moslem has is Jihad:
They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of the Islamic calendar). Say, "Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allah is to prevent mankind from following the Way of Allah, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.
This video gives you a general overview from approximately the 8th century to the 18th century. In Episode 7 I will cover the period following the Mughal Era to the present day, including the post-...
Sura 2 or the Heifer is one of the last 'revelatory' chapters given by the archangel Gabriel, he of Gospel fame, to Muhammad, on behalf of the former family deity and moon idol Hub'Al, recast by Muhammad as the monotheistic Al-Lah or 'The One'. Being one of the last 'communications' with the divine, Sura 2 is of great importance in the Koran and within Moslem liturgy. Over half of this Sura is Christianophic with at least 15 % of this chapter, or some 44 verses [bare minimum], being openly violent and preaching the physical destruction of the Christians. Combined these examples of Christianophobia appear to be a surprisingly large and intolerant amount from a cult dedicated to peace and brotherly love:
Jubilee, how many slaughtered by the cult of Muhammad in the last 11 years ?
If immigration patterns and Muslims’ comparatively higher birth rates continue, Pew projects:
• U.S. Muslims will go from a tiny minority now, less than 1% of the nation, to 1.7%. That’s a jump from 2.6 million people in 2010 to 6.2 million.
• Muslim immigration to the USA and Muslims’ share of all new legal permanent residents will continue to rise. Most of the immigrants will arrive from South Asia, the Middle East and Africa.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SbvjtamvnM4?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”
Jerusalem has been called the most controversial piece of real estate on earth. Jerusalem is widely recognized as a city holy to three world religions. The media consistently refers to it as the holiest site in Judaism, and the third holiest site in Islam. It is also home to important Christian sites like the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the Via Dolorosa and the Mount of Olives, but it has never been essential to Christian theology that Jerusalem be ruled by a Christian power. The primary justification for the Crusades was to reopen the holy sites to Christian pilgrims who had been barred by the Muslim occupation of the city, not to permanently conquer land. Furthermore, in the 21st century Christians make up less than 2% of the Holy Land’s population, a number that is steadily decreasing as they are driven out by their increasingly radical Muslim neighbors. Thus, today the principle competing claims to the city come from Judaism and Islam. Let’s examine these claims:
Muslims can paint a false portrait of their founder all they want. Their Koran – a pagan fascist document which outstrips Mein Kampf in gibberish and ranting racism – the Hadiths or explanations to the unreadable Koran; and the biography of the founder or Sira; tell us about the real Mohammed. Muslims are only lying to themselves when they try to represent Mohammed as a 'prophet' of peace, love, merriment and inter-cultural extasy. Their own documents and histories tell us otherwise. Mohammed was in effect a murderous brigand; probably quite insane and a man with lusts for blood, power, sex and murder which would challenge even the most intolerant of Mongol, Turkish, or Central Asian nomad in quantity and ferocity. Mohammed was in essence the anti-Christ.
Why do Moslems in Gaza hate the Jews so much ? Why did the Islamic imperialist conquest of Judea and Israel in 638 AD mandate dhimmitude or second-class knave status for all Jews and Christians ? Why have the Arabs launched 6 wars against the Jews in Israel since 1947 ? Why do Imams, the hierarchy of Islamic theocratic governance and Moslem jurists and poli-ocratic preachers demand a second holocaust ? Further why do Western morons, dimwits, and racists side with the Arab Moslems on this issue ?
Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi is the most popular Islamic preacher in the world. And he has done this before. He said on al-Jazeera: “Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers….”