Western Civilisation

Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam

Recent Articles

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Bukhari's Hadiths and 4:52:196 - 'salvation through Mohammed' ?

Your soul shall be saved by a mass murdering Jihadist ?

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Hadiths are the collected stories, sayings and imparted warnings of Mohammed, the founder of the collectivist, totalitarian Meccan cult devoted to the Allah [contraction ilah], the 'Lord' of Mecca, who was of course the moon deity or Hu'Baal. Mohammed's full name was Abdullah, or slave of Allah. The pagan and quite celestial antecedents of Hu'Baal or the Meccan ilah are obvious to any who have taken the time to study Arab history. Mohammed was no more than a deranged brigand, a thug with an army, who raped, killed, plundered, sex-slaved and murdered, whilst becoming incredibly wealthy. Academics and sundry experts declaim the life of this warlord illustrates a prophet-hood, holding high the mantle of religiosity, waving a standard of peace.

The Hadiths of Bukhari are the 3rd most important liturgical source of inspiration for Moslems, after Mein Koran, and Mein Sira [a purported biography of Mohammed]. They are holy. Following the Koran they are also quite bloody and intolerant. The Hadiths were written in about 900 AD or some 270 years after Mohammed's death. They were culled from the oral traditions, scraps of writings and the general Moslem memory. The Hadiths show a cult that is deformed, violent and Jihadic.

Bukhari's work is of dubious authenticity. It is massive, ponderous, incoherent, poorly written and organized. It thus mimics the Koran. The messaging is clear however. Mohammed is the supreme representation of divine favour. Everything he said and did was therefore of inestimable importance. If you don't follow this divine 'messenger' you transgress against the divine law and are thus open for punishment.

The main theme of Bukhari's Hadiths is 4:52:196:

Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)" (Bukhari Hadith, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196) Source

Saved through Mohammed ? This is a plagiarism from the Bible. The New Testament discusses the human being 'saved' through his belief in Christ whose mission was the exact opposites of Mohammed's. Islam is thereby the anti-Christ doctrine. Christ tells his apostles”

Mark 16:15-18, "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."

In Bukhari's Hadith passage above it is only Mohammed who can save humans and provide salvation. One intention of Mohammedansim is to replace Christ with the founder of the monotheistic ilah cult. But why would anyone believe that a man who murdered, sex-slaved, owned a harem, waged war, cut of the heads of Jews and Christians and tortured his enemies can now magically 'save them' ? From what exactly ? People like Mohammed ?

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Bookmark and Share

ISIS is Islam. Islam is ISIS. A simple equation.

Based on history and the Koran.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

For geniuses, ISIS or ISIL is not Islam. The cult of Mecca is always portrayed as singularly civilized, advanced, tolerant and progressive. This is why the Moslem world today is a cesspool mess of blood, death, illiteracy, polygamy, slavery, misogyny and poverty. Obviously Islam is so vaunted, it leads to the modern Moslem state – impoverished, riven by violence, incest and destruction.

Barack Obama has made it clear: “ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents.” David Cameron intoned: “What we are witnessing is actually a battle between Islam on the one hand and extremists who want to abuse Islam on the other. These extremists, often funded by fanatics living far away from the battlefields, pervert the Islamic faith as a way of justifying their warped and barbaric ideology – and they do so not just in Iraq and Syria but right across the world, from Boko Haram and al-Shabaab to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Source

Obama a Moslem sympathizer, and the entire Western elite including the arch-Moslemophile Cameron, are insipid, blind, dangerous, deluded and ignorant. They are plutocratic morons fully invested in their Marxist-Multiculturalist contra-reality theology. Obama entombed inside the Moslem Brotherhood's influence; has said nothing about the 3.000 or so Christians brutally executed by ISIS including women and children. He only wails pity about the dead Moslems ISIS has dispatched on behalf of the moon deity HuBaal the Lord of Mecca or ilah. Cameron and his fellow multicult travellers are accessories to murder pure and simple. They are doing nothing to stop the slaughter of Christians in Iraq and Syria. Even worse, being good simpletons they will import more of these desert Allah fascists into their states, until the Western world is just a larger version of Brussels or Kosovo.

ISIS is Islam. Islam is ISIS. ISIS is simply implementing Sharia – Koranic 'law', or Moslem bronze-age barbaric theocratic rule. A fact loss on academics, the media and witless politicians such as Cameron and Obama. 

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Russophiles and Moslemophiles - a group of sad, sorry, mentally deficient utopians

Not hard to find geniuses who applaud Russia and excuse Islam.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Russian invasion of the Ukraine is rather obvious. This incursion into foreign territory was easily predicted back 6 or 7 years ago, by simply listening to the neo-Soviet Politburo chatter in the Kremlin. The intention is to annex not just the Crimea – a tasty starter – but the industrialized, mineral-rich Eastern Ukraine. Russian troops in their thousands now operate in the Ukraine, yet Western Russophiles deny the invasion, deny the bloodshed initiated by the Neo-Soviet cabal in Moscow, and even defend Russian eradication of Ukrainian sovereignty in the Crimea and the Eastern Ukraine. If China invades Siberia or the neo-Soviet borderlands rich with resources; I would expect the same cacophony of stupidity to rain down in support of the Chinese invasion.

According to Russophile geniuses, the Ukrainian government is 'fascist' [Hitler's cult of evolution and race supremacy I suppose they mean]; is engaged in killing Ukrainians by the score; whilst Russia is simply trying to 'feed' and 'cloth' the 'poor people' caught in the Ukrainian government's Hobbesian war of the state Leviathan against the peasants. Marxist revolutionary chants and sloganeering included. Apparently the 'Ukrainian separatists' are freedom loving pro-Moscow, pro-human rights saints, desirous of trade, culture, peace and love.

One would expect that such a distorted mental illness in viewing an obvious invasion, informs the Russophile's view of Islam – obviously 'most' Moslems [like the Russians] are peaceniks, intent on inter-faith harmony and understanding. If there is violence in the name of the cult of Submission, than blame the victim. If the Russians invade a neighbouring country, blame the raped and plundered.

If Putin were to cut off Porosenko's head with his own macho-army issued machete, the Russophiles [aka Soviet supporters]; would blame the Ukrainian untermensch, just as Moslemophiles ignore the severed heads, the recent 3.000 dead Christians in Syria and Iraq, and the mutilated bodies of raped women, and bloody babies, shrugging their relativist shoulders and moaning 'what about the Crusades?' Geniuses.  

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Brunelleschi's amazing Dome of the early 15th century

The big brains always move this masterpiece into the Renaissance.....

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

According to the 'Enlightenment thinkers', starting with the redoubtably ignorant Petrarch, all was 'Dark' and opaque before 1550. Then suddenly, magically, the world of 'science', 'evolved' and man was freed. Thanks to Islam, Voltaire and Darwin, mankind's rationality was enabled, casting off 2000 years of oppression, fear, superstition and dirty stupidity. Which is why of course during said period, there were such monumental achievements as hospitals, eye glasses, chimneys, the blast furnace, science, math, public schools, art, polyphonic music, orchestras....

Brunelleschi's early 15th century dome in Florence is yet another example of unparalleled genius in the Middle Ages. Of course the 'Renaissance' claims this to be their own, as if this period of development was divorced from, and antagonistic to, what came before it. For the phase theologians of the not-so-Enlightened period; the time frames of the Middle Ages are very fluid indeed. Giotto's 3-D artwork from the early 14th century, along with Dante and sundry technologies such as wind-mills, are routinely categorized as part of the 'Renaissance'. Such fraudulent posturing is called 'factual'.

Brunelleschi’s Florentine dome, started in 1419, is situated firmly within the Medieval period, an era of great progress and wealth creation; and is the largest masonry dome ever built and is an astonishing 45 meters wide. It was created in part to supersede Justinian's enormous 6th century dome in the Haggia Sophia in Constantinople. The complexity of the project was staggering and it took more than 100 years from the original idea in 1296, to 1419, to start the affair. In fact even today, we don't fully understand how Brunelleschi achieved his masterpiece.

Perhaps the most haunting mystery is the simplest of all: How did Brunelleschi and his masons position each brick, stone beam, and other structural element with such precision inside the vastly complex cathedral—a task that modern architects with their laser levels, GPS positioning devices, and CAD software would still find challenging today?”

Brunelleschi's dome was built squarely in the Middle Ages. But don't expert to hear 'experts' and quackademics admit that fact. They will simply move the 1419 project to the 'Renaissance'. Anything to avoid the obvious and anything to inure the cult of the Enlightenment from criticism.

History of the Dome is here

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Byzantium: A Christian and cultural Colossus

Without the Eastern Roman empire, the world would be a much different and poorer place.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

When you hear ignoramuses discuss a 'Dark Age', ask them if they meant Byzantium, a city and empire which is the longest lived in history – 1131 years – and which was very Christian. From its inception in 324 AD until 1453 AD, Byzantium might have been the richest city in world history, with its collection of gold, silver, art, literature and precious artifacts without precedent. Maybe the brain-washed liberal arts major can explain how a Christian empire could have been so long-lived and produced the following in a 'Dark Age':

-Largest city on the planet for 1000 years – Constantinople, Moslem propaganda notwithstanding. [Constantinople contained about 1 million, a claim Moslems made for Cordoba pop. 50.000, and Baghdad, pop. 200.000].

-The most innovative and exquisite Cathedral until the Gothic period; the Haggia Sophia, which was the largest masonry project in world history outside of Herod's 2nd Temple; and contains the largest dome ever built until Florence in the 15th century (but remember it was a dark age in Florence as well in 1400...)

-World's first university dating from the early 5th century was established at Constantinople.

-World's first public school system dates from about 400 AD in Byzantium.

-Constantinople was the largest marble-building site in world history. The city is literally built from the same marble stone, and all of the city's buildings were erected from an island quarry named Marmara. No other city was built from marble on such a scale.

-Byzantium erected the largest aqueducts ever built, carrying water from 150 miles away, some aqueduct bridges are 90 feet high. These dwarf anything the Western Romans built.

-Underground sewers along with enormous water storage facilities were created – for the first time in history in Constantinople. Cisterns below the city held enough water for many years of usage – all fed by natural springs 150 miles away.

-Byzantine art and architecture influenced the civilized world and greatly influenced the art and architecture of Western Europe, Russia, the Near East, and even Iran and China.

-A codex of laws, diplomatic rules and regulations, and policies governing inter-state relations were developed in Byzantium and used by other empires and states.

-Astrolabe, architectural innovations, astronomy, Greek and Roman learning and sundry other inventions were carried from Byzantium to every part of its extensive trade route.

-Ptolemy’s Almagest which laid out a Greek and Christian view of a spherical earth at the centre of the universe, and which calculated the earth's circumference along with literally thousands of important astronomical observations found its way into Western society through Byzantium.

-Greek-fire was a unique and highly effective Byzantine invention.  Many other military inventions including the Trebuchet [a gravity inspired heavy object/missile launcher dating from the 6th century]; influenced Western military technology.

The Byzantine empire had mortal weaknesses which led to its final demise. Most of these centered around the ills of despotism, centralized governance, over-taxation, bureaucratic corruption; and a belief, common to all major empires; that they were the centre of the world and that their world would never end.

Despite these weaknesses there is little doubt that this rich, successful, advanced and culturally supreme Christian empire, was the most important centre of learning, the arts, culture and trade for 1000 years. There is a very good argument to make, that without Byzantium's influence and indeed its wealth post the 1204 Crusader sacking of Constantinople, that Western Europe may not have developed modern civilization. The critical aspect of Byzantium was the fact it was Christian, and this world-view of Christianity allowed the Eastern Greek Romans to create a cultural colossus that impacted history and furthered the development of mankind. So much for the 'Dark Ages'.  

Friday, August 22, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Western Media dis-information, dissociating ISIS from Islam

Cowards the lot of them.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Mainstream/Lamebain media view of Islam. ISIS, Hamas, Hizbollah, Al Qaeda et al are 'fringe extremists' corrupting a 'religion'. If you study what these groups say, they are simply implementing Koranic law, that is to say, they are holding true and fast to what the founder of the moon cult named Submission demanded. Muhammad's screed of supremacism, racism, violence and madness is no different than other communal creeds of Jihad and endless war, such as Nazism, or Communism. Witness the vapidity of a leading 'conservative' newspaper, the WSJ, and its op-ed on ISIS:

But now, after months of graphic violence and crude propaganda, and after Foley's beheading, the nature, threat and intentions of ISIS have become clear. This week the president sent bombers. There were no demonstrations in protest. Even the pope didn't protest. To stop violent aggressors, Francis noted when asked about the U.S. bombings, is "licit." He did not explicitly support bombing, but noted the stopping of groups such as ISIS was justifiable.

The good thing, the comfort, is that as each day passes the civilized world, as we used to say, gets a closer, clearer look at who these people are.”

This ridiculous article is titled, 'A new kind of Terrorism', as if Moslem terror and Jihad is either new or not based on Koranic fascism.

These words do not appear in the op-ed: Islam, Moslem, Koran, Sharia, Christian, non-Moslem, slavery or crucifixion. ISIS is sex-slaving women, crucifying Christians, murdering non-Moslems and implementing Sharia Law. This non-reporting is peculiarly pathetic and all-too-common. It is as if the Statist 'West' is facing only a 'terrorist threat', from some band of disembodied brigands and thugs. ISIS is Islam and Islam is inherently hostile to civilization. Unless you name the enemy, you will never defeat it.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Byzantium and its legacy of legal processes

A remarkable addition from the Eastern Christian Roman Empire.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Historian Louise Adena wrote the following about Byzantium and its impact on the West:

The Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire with Constantinople at its heart was established at the beginning of the fourth century AD by the Roman Emperor Constantine (272-337AD). While it remained a major world cultural and commercial centre for over 1000 years, it has been only during the twentieth century that European historians have come to acknowledge its profound influence on Western Europe. Its enduring legacies are seen in European art and legal systems. It was also key to the widespread adoption of Christianity in Europe; it was the base for the spread of learning in Europe providing continuity between ancient Greek and Roman civilisations and into the European Renaissance.” [Bold emphasis is mine]

The Eastern Roman empire, suffused in Greek and Near Eastern language and culture, is certainly one of history's forgotten empires. Along with Western Church canon law, some remnants of Roman Law, Byzantium certainly helped shaped Western legal jurisprudence and its impact is still in evidence today. Under Emperor Justinian (482-565AD) the Eastern Roman empire compiled laws and legislation into one legal code - the ‘Codex Justinianus’. This codex compiled into one extant form, all of the state's laws which the citizens would be obliged to follow.

This idea whilst not entirely revolutionary, was profound. It introduced the legal concept of innocent-until-proven-guilty, which relied on proof, witnesses, a due process and common-sense. Justinian's codex is therefore one of the main planks of our modern legal system, equalizing all citizens before an impartial set of laws, and ostracizing the baleful influence of wealth and power over proper legal proceedings and decisions.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Byzantium: The forgotten influence on Western Civilization

Rome never did fall. Byzantium lived on.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

In the development of civilization, an often overlooked contributor was the Roman-Greek empire of Byzantium. The influences of Byzantium affected Western art, architecture, military technology, philosophy and even medicine. Justinian the Serbian peasant and Byzantine Tsar in 535 AD onwards, initiated a series of wars to reclaim Western Roman territory which devastated Italy and North Africa, weakening both areas for generations. In the Byzantine mind, the Western Roman empire, which had splintered into 3 Germanic kingdoms and various petty Lordships; belonged to the Eastern Roman empire.

The Moslems plundered Byzantium both literally and figuratively, and it is from the Eastern Roman empire that all of the Islamic architecture is derived. Indeed Byzantine Christian slaves and dhimmis were vital in the management of various Caliphates, the teaching of Greek and Roman literature and learning to Moslems; the translation of essential ideas and works ranging from astronomy to medicaments; and of course the architecting of sundry Mosques. The Grand Mosque in Cordoba uses the columns, arches and layout of various temples, public buildings and bath houses found in Constantinople.

Eastern Rome before the time of the Moslem invasions had become rich. But it also had become mystical, bureaucratic, ossified, and out of date. It was rigid. The fact that remnants of the Eastern Roman empire survived until 1453 and the Moslem eradication of Constantinople [40.000 killed, 30.000 enslaved]; is a remarkable testimony, however, to its former power, importance and organization. What Eastern Rome needed was the Western 'renaissance' which occurred after the Western Roman empire thankfully went out of business. Both empires outlived their usefulness and their utility, especially regarding the lives of ordinary people, and the further development of civilization including its spiritual component.

An excellent one volume study of Byzantium is by Julius Norwich. Though in need of repair the Moslem destruction of this civilization was a tragedy.

Byzantine's collapse was for many reasons, an inevitability. Nevertheless its destruction is one of the greatest tragedies in history. The Turkish takeover of Constantinople and the destruction of a noble, intelligent and complicated culture did nothing to advance civilisation. In the place of Greek and Roman learning, there was erected a primitive, expansive and aggressive Islamic cult and empire – shut off from inquiry, science and spiritual tolerance and dedicated to imperialism. We see the results today in the failed Islamic states which gird the globe from North Africa to Pakistan. This might have been Europe's fate as well - if not for Byzantium.”

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Anglo Saxon art the lie of a 'dark age'

Try discovering the process to produce intricate art, or stained-glass....

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Middle Ages was an era of enormous artistic output. Archaeology has only revealed a small tithe of what existed. Plunder, destruction, theft and lost treasure unfortunately impoverish our modern understanding of the artistic impulse of this period. Likely no more than 2% of what was produced from 500-1000 AD has been recovered. But even this fractional amount reveals an astonishing society of wealth, culture and creativity.

A good history of Anglo-Saxon and early Anglo-Saxon English art can be found here.

625 AD: Anglo Saxon jewellery from Sutton Hoo England, and the burial mound of an Anglo-Saxon King:

Witness the genius of this Anglo-Saxon shoulder clasp: possibly the highest standard of European jewellery art ever found. Not until modern kilns were developed could reproductions of what lies buried at Sutton be made, such was the intricacy of this and other artifacts. Only a sophisticated, wealthy, active and industrializing society, could produce Anglo-Saxon art.

The oldest surviving example of a stained glass window, which reaches back into the time of the 7th century rests in Jarrow England. The English historian Bede would have seen this particular display of genius. Stained glass manufacture is incredibly complicated. No other society in the world developed this art form.

St Paul's Church in Jarrow England, a 7th century stained glass window.

Jarrow window

Glass is made by fusing together some form of silica such as sand, an alkali such as potash or soda, and lime or lead oxide. The color is produced by adding a metallic oxide to the raw materials. Copper oxide, under different conditions, produces ruby, blue, or green colors in glass. Cobalt is usually used to produce most shades of blues. Green shades can also be obtained from the addition of chromium and iron oxide. Golden glass is sometimes colored with uranium, cadmium sulfide, or titanium, and there are fine selenium yellows as well as vermilions. Ruby colored glass is made by adding gold.”

Here: Methods and details of stained glass formation

But remember all was dark. No light shone. Only Islam, Galileo and Voltaire would stand athwart the path to the abyss.....which is why Moslems never produced art to match Sutton Hoo or a stained glass window and Voltaire et al could not replicate the processes of discovery to make something as intricate or redoubtable as a Sutton Hoo bracelet. This is why they were so enlightened. 

Monday, August 18, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The Lindisfarne Gospels and civilized art

No equivalent outside the Book of Kells anywhere in the world.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Show me the Moslem equivalent.

The Lindisfarne gospels were created in the late 7th century by Catholic monks in their north-eastern England retreat. One monk in particular Eadfrith, is credited with the astonishing artwork, without precedent in Europe. Next to the Book of Kells [see here], the decorated Lindisfarne manuscript laid out on vellum, elaborately furnished with intricate artwork of staggering detail, is one of the world's greatest works of art. It stands along with the Book of Kells as an unrivalled testimony to religion and civilization. Dedicated to the 4 gospel writers, this middle-ages manifest is a dedication to beauty, truth, awareness and supreme culture. It combines the essence of European art with a distinctly Anglo-Saxon skill and view of the world.

An audio and book translation can be found here.

The Lindisfarne Gospels, one of the most magnificent manuscripts of the early Middle Ages, was written and decorated at the end of the 7th century by the monk Eadfrith, who became Bishop of Lindisfarne in 698 and died in 721. Its original leather binding, long since lost, was made by Ethelwald, who succeeded Eadfrith as bishop, and was decorated with jewels and precious metals later in the 8th century by Billfrith the Anchorite. The Latin text of the Gospels is translated word by word in an Old English gloss, the earliest surviving example of the Gospel text in any form of the English language, it was added between the lines in the mid 10th century by Aldred, Provost of Chester-le-Street. Today the manuscript is once again bound in silver and jewels, in covers made in 1852 at the expense of Edward Maltby, Bishop of Durham. The design is based on motifs drawn from the decoration of the manuscript itself....”

But remember, before sundry fat and ignorant atheists such as Gibbon, Diderot, Voltaire or Hume, or the fraud of all trades Galileo, Europe stank in a 'dark age'. Superstition and stupidity reigned, art and society had collapsed. Nothing of value was manufactured. Only Islam kept the candle of civilization burning.....and all awaited the grand entrance of the 17th century and the age of science [along with witch-burning, abiogenesis, the occult, Puritanism, Spanish insolvency, the 30 years war to control Germany...].

So the propaganda tells us. 

Saturday, August 16, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Partial list of Moslem attacks on American citizens, assets, territory.

The Fascist cult of Muhammad goose steps on.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Partial list of Moslem assaults just against US assets, citizens or territory. By all means live in the fiction that the cult of Muhammad is peace and love. Let's juxtapose this list against the 'terror' incidents incited by Catholics – all zero of them. Source and bold highlights are mine.


Sept. 6, 1970, Jordan: – The first mass aircraft hijackings occurred in 1970, the so-called Dawson’s Field hijackings, when the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine seized control of two American planes and one Swiss airliner, all bound from Europe to the United States, to punish the United States for supporting Israel. The Pan Am, TWA and Swissair planes were blown up on the ground in Jordan and Egypt.


Nov. 4, Tehran, Iran: Iranian radical students seized the U.S. embassy, taking 66 hostages. 14 were later released. The remaining 52 were freed after 444 days on the day of President Reagan’s inauguration. United States Embassy in Pakistan attacked by mob mistakenly blaming the US for radical Islamic faction hostage crisis in Mecca.


Lebanon: Thirty US and other Western hostages kidnapped in Lebanon by Hezbollah. Some were killed, some died in captivity, and some were eventually released. Terry Anderson was held for 2,454 days.


April 18, Beirut, Lebanon: U.S. embassy destroyed in suicide car-bomb attack; 63 dead, including 17 Americans. The Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility.
Oct. 23, Beirut, Lebanon: Shiite suicide bombers exploded truck near U.S. military barracks at Beirut airport, killing 241 marines. Minutes later a second bomb killed 58 French paratroopers in their barracks in West Beirut.
Dec. 12, Kuwait City, Kuwait: Shiite truck bombers attacked the U.S. embassy and other targets, killing 5 and injuring 80.


Jan. 18, Beirut: Malcolm Kerr, president of the American University in Beirut (AUB), was assassinated near his office. He had replaced AUB president David Dodge, who was kidnapped six months earlier. A telephone message claiming to represent Islamic Jihad proclaimed: “We are responsible of the assassination of the president of AUB … We also vow that not a single American or French will remain on this soil. We shall take no different course. And we shall not waver.”
March 16, Beirut: William Francis Buckley, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Beirut chief of station, was abducted on this date. Islamic Jihad claims to have killed him on 3 October 1985, and later released to a Beirut newspaper a photograph purporting to depict his corpse. Press reports stated that Buckley had been transferred to Iran, where he was tortured and killed.
May 1984, West Beirut: Presbyterian minister Benjamin Weir is kidnapped by three armed men. Weir may have thought he was safe from harm from Muslims because he had lived in Lebanon since 1958. He lived in Shiite West Beirut working “closely with various Muslim-oriented charity and relief groups”. Two days after his abduction, a telephone message allegedly from Islamic Jihad, claiming responsibility for the abduction “in order to renew our acceptance of Reagan’s challenge and to confirm our commitment of the statement … that we will not leave any American on Lebanese soil.” Weir was freed sixteen months later.
Sept. 20, east Beirut, Lebanon: truck bomb exploded outside the U.S. embassy annex, killing 24, including 2 U.S. military.
Dec. 3, Beirut, Lebanon: Kuwait Airways Flight 221, from Kuwait to Pakistan, hijacked and diverted to Tehran. 2 Americans killed.


April 12, Madrid, Spain: Bombing at restaurant frequented by U.S. soldiers, killed 18 Spaniards and injured 82.
June 14, Beirut, Lebanon: TWA Flight 847 en route from Athens to Rome hijacked to Beirut by Hezbollah terrorists and held for 17 days. A U.S. Navy diver executed.
Aug. 9, Frankfurt, Germany: The car bomb planted at Rhein-Main Air Base exploded, killing two and wounding eleven.
Oct, 7, Alexandria, Egypt: Achille Lauro hijacking, wheel-chair bound American killed by Palestinian militants.
Nov. 25, Frankfurt, Germany: A car bomb exploded outside of the Post Exchange complex in Frankfurt, Germany, wounding 34.
Dec. 12, Newfoundland: Arrow Air Flight 1285 taking off from Gander, Newfoundland, crashes and burns about half a mile from the runway, killing all 256 passengers and crew on board. In an anonymous caller to a French news agency in Beirut, Islamic Jihad claims it destroyed the plane to prove “our ability to strike at the Americans anywhere.”
Dec. 18, Rome, Italy, and Vienna, Austria: airports in Rome and Vienna were bombed, killing 20 people, 5 of whom were Americans. Bombing linked to Libya.


April 2, Athens, Greece: A bomb exploded aboard TWA flight 840 en route from Rome to Athens, killing 4 Americans and injuring 9.
April 5, West Berlin, Germany: Libyans bombed a disco frequented by U.S. servicemen, killing 2 and injuring hundreds.


Dec. 21, Lockerbie, Scotland: N.Y.-bound Pan-Am Boeing 747 exploded in flight from a terrorist bomb and crashed into Scottish village, killing all 259 aboard and 11 on the ground. Passengers included 35 Syracuse University students and many U.S. military personnel. Libya formally admitted responsibility 15 years later (Aug. 2003) and offered $2.7 billion compensation to victims’ families.


Feb. 26, New York City: bomb exploded in basement garage of World Trade Center, killing 6 and injuring at least 1,040 others. In 1995, militant Islamist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and 9 others were convicted of conspiracy charges, and in 1998, Ramzi Yousef, believed to have been the mastermind, was convicted of the bombing. Al-Qaeda involvement is suspected.


Nov. 13, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: car bomb exploded at U.S. military headquarters, killing 5 U.S. military servicemen.


June 25, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: truck bomb exploded outside Khobar Towers military complex, killing 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. 13 Saudis and a Lebanese, all alleged members of Islamic militant group Hezbollah, were indicted on charges relating to the attack in June 2001.


Aug. 7, Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: truck bombs exploded almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies, killing 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. 4 men connected with al-Qaeda 2 of whom had received training at al-Qaeda camps inside Afghanistan, were convicted of the killings in May 2001 and later sentenced to life in prison. A federal grand jury had indicted 22 men in connection with the attacks, including Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, who remained at large.


Oct. 12, Aden, Yemen: U.S. Navy destroyer USS Cole heavily damaged when a small boat loaded with explosives blew up alongside it. 17 sailors killed. Linked to Osama bin Laden, or members of al-Qaeda terrorist network.


Sept. 11, New York City, Arlington, Va., and Shanksville, Pa.: hijackers crashed 2 commercial jets into twin towers of World Trade Center; 2 more hijacked jets were crashed into the Pentagon and a field in rural Pa. Total dead and missing numbered 2,9921: 2,749 in New York City, 184 at the Pentagon, 40 in Pa., and 19 hijackers. Islamic al-Qaeda terrorist group blamed. (See September 11, 2001: Timeline of Terrorism.)


June 14, Karachi, Pakistan: bomb explodes outside American consulate in Karachi, Pakistan, killing 12. Linked to al-Qaeda.


May 12, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: suicide bombers kill 34, including 8 Americans, at housing compounds for Westerners. Al-Qaeda suspected.


May 29–31, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: terrorists attack the offices of a Saudi oil company in Khobar, Saudi Arabia, take foreign oil workers hostage in a nearby residential compound, leaving 22 people dead including one American.
June 11–19, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: terrorists kidnap and execute Paul Johnson Jr., an American, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2 other Americans and BBC cameraman killed by gun attacks.
Dec. 6, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: terrorists storm the U.S. consulate, killing 5 consulate employees. 4 terrorists were killed by Saudi security.


Nov. 9, Amman, Jordan: suicide bombers hit 3 American hotels, Radisson, Grand Hyatt, and Days Inn, in Amman, Jordan, killing 57. Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility.


Sept. 13, Damascus, Syria: an attack by four gunman on the American embassy is foiled.


Jan. 12, Athens, Greece: the U.S. embassy is fired on by an anti-tank missile causing damage but no injuries.
Dec. 11, Algeria: more than 60 people are killed, including 11 United Nations staff members, when Al Qaeda terrorists detonate two car bombs near Algeria’s Constitutional Council and the United Nations offices.


May 26, Iraq: a suicide bomber on a motorcycle kills six U.S. soldiers and wounds 18 others in Tarmiya.
June 24, Iraq: a suicide bomber kills at least 20 people, including three U.S. Marines, at a meeting between sheiks and Americans in Karmah, a town west of Baghdad.
June 12, Afghanistan: four American servicemen are killed when a roadside bomb explodes near a U.S. military vehicle in Farah Province.
July 13, Afghanistan: nine U.S.soldiers and at least 15 NATO troops die when Taliban militants boldly attack an American base in Kunar Province, which borders Pakistan. It’s the most deadly against U.S. troops in three years.
Aug. 18 and 19, Afghanistan: as many as 15 suicide bombers backed by about 30 militants attack a U.S. military base, Camp Salerno, in Bamiyan. Fighting between U.S. troops and members of the Taliban rages overnight. No U.S. troops are killed.
Sept. 16, Yemen: a car bomb and a rocket strike the U.S. embassy in Yemen as staff arrived to work, killing 16 people, including 4 civilians. At least 25 suspected al-Qaeda militants are arrested for the attack.
Nov. 26, India: in a series of attacks on several of Mumbai’s landmarks and commercial hubs that are popular with Americans and other foreign tourists, including at least two five-star hotels, a hospital, a train station, and a cinema. About 300 people are wounded and nearly 190 people die, including at least 5 Americans.


Feb. 9, Iraq: a suicide bomber kills four American soldiers and their Iraqi translator near a police checkpoint.
April 10, Iraq: a suicide attack kills five American soldiers and two Iraqi policemen.
June 1, Little Rock, Arkansas: Abdulhakim Muhammed, a Muslim convert from Memphis, Tennessee, is charged with shooting two soldiers outside a military recruiting center. One is killed and the other is wounded. In a January 2010 letter to the judge hearing his case, Muhammed asked to change his plea from not guilty to guilty, claimed ties to al-Qaeda, and called the shooting a jihadi attack “to fight those who wage war on Islam and Muslims.”
November 5 2009, Fort Hood Texas: Nidal Hassan an army doctor, screaming Allahu Akhbar which means the moon idol of Mecca, Hub'Al is first amongst all the gods, murdered 13 and wounded 34 at a US military base. The Obama administration called this act 'workplace violence' and the media obsessed with his mental issues, not with Islam.
Dec. 25: A Nigerian man on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit attempted to ignite an explosive device hidden in his underwear. The explosive device that failed to detonate was a mixture of powder and liquid that did not alert security personnel in the airport. The alleged bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, told officials later that he was directed by the terrorist group Al Qaeda. The suspect was already on the government’s watch list when he attempted the bombing; his father, a respected Nigerian banker, had told the U.S. government that he was worried about his son’s increased extremism.
Dec. 30, Iraq: a suicide bomber kills eight Americans civilians, seven of them CIA agents, at a base in Afghanistan. It’s the deadliest attack on the agency since 9/11. The attacker is reportedly a double agent from Jordan who was acting on behalf of al-Qaeda.


May 1, New York City: a car bomb is discovered in Times Square, New York City after smoke is seen coming from a vehicle. The bomb was ignited, but failed to detonate and was disarmed before it could cause any harm. Times Square was evacuated as a safety precaution. Faisal Shahzad pleads guilty to placing the bomb as well as 10 terrorism and weapons charges.
May 10, Jacksonville, Florida: a pipe bomb explodes while approximately 60 Muslims are praying in the mosque. The attack causes no injuries.
Oct. 29: two packages are found on separate cargo planes. Each package contains a bomb consisting of 300 to 400 grams (11-14 oz) of plastic explosives and a detonating mechanism. The bombs are discovered as a result of intelligence received from Saudi Arabia’s security chief. The packages, bound from Yemen to the United States, are discovered at en route stop-overs, one in England and one in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.


Jan. 17, Spokane, Washington: a pipe bomb is discovered along the route of the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial march. The bomb, a “viable device” set up to spray marchers with shrapnel and to cause multiple casualties, is defused without any injuries.


Sept. 11, Benghazi, Libya: militants armed with antiaircraft weapons and rocket-propelled grenades fire upon the American consulate, killing U.S. ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other embassy officials. U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton said the U.S. believed that Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, a group closely linked to Al Qaeda, orchestrated the attack.


Feb. 1, Ankara, Turkey: Ecevit Sanli detonates a bomb near a gate at the U.S. Embassy. Sanli dies after detonating the bomb. One Turkish guard is also killed. Didem Tuncay, a respected television journalist, is injured in the blast. Unlike the bombing at the embassy in Benghazi last September, the U.S. government immediately calls the bombing a terrorist attack. According to Turkish officials, the attack is from the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party, which has been labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. and other nations.

April 15, Boston, Mass.: multiple bombs explode near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. Two bombs go off around 2:50 in the afternoon as runners finish the race. Three people are killed. One is an eight year old boy. More than 260 people are injured. The two Moslems are brothers and had been living together in Cambridge. They have lived in the U.S. for about a decade, but are from a Moslem area near Chechnya, a region in Russia.

See a pattern ? Lots more to come from the Moslem cult of death.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Moslem Caliphate: 'Chasing a Mirage', or Chasing the Koran's commandments ?

Moslem Fascism alive and well

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Tarek Fatah is a Canadian Moslem – sort of - who is deeply worried about a 'parallel' Moslem state developing in Canada, full of Moslem civilization including the slaughter of daughters, 3 wives, bedsheets for female slaves and chattel, and the requisite beheading of Jews and Christians. All in the name of the Multi-culti that everyone is so in love with. Diversity and all that.

He wrote a book some time ago, laughing at the idea of a Moslem Caliphate. It was entitled 'Chasing a Mirage'. I reviewed it and he was none to pleased about my comments. Today however, I doubt that 2.500 dead Christians in Iraq and Syria during the past few months would believe ISIS' Caliphate is a mirage. 45 Churches and counting, thousands of dead Christians, many more raped and exiled, all by Moslems from ISIS which is after all, only implementing Koranic law.

My review of Fatah's book included the obvious observation:

Fatah is a devout Muslim and earnestly believes that Islamic faith in its benign form is compatible with Western civilisation. On this and many other points in his book he is wrong. The importance of his book is that he presents a historical and world view which demands Muslim reform and a rejection of extremist political Islam. On this issue hangs the future balance of Western-Muslim relations. It is up to Muslims to reform their ideology.”

Moslems will never reform Islam. It is incompatible with human civilization. There is no Carolingian-12th century Renaissance within Islam. There is no 10th-14th century explosion of technology, science, and real-world applicability to theology. There is no development of faith leading to reason; and reason being used to justify faith. For Moslems and the Koran it is violence, coercion, hate, hell-fire for the Infidel, and the declamation obtained from Muhammad, to crucify and execute the Jews, Christians and the insufficiently pious Moslem [5:33].

As I remarked whilst reviewing his book:

Islam is of course an ideology, not a faith. This is something that Fatah a practicing Muslim would reject. But at least he and others can recognise the inherent fascistic intolerance and will to rule embedded in the Koran and in political Islam. Fatah is simply sick to death of the intolerant elements of his 'faith'. His book is an attempt to wake up Muslims to the extremist agendas being fostered not only on Muslims, but also on non-Muslims within the West. Fundamentalist Islam is alive and doing very well within Western states. Wahabbist, neo-Salafist, and Anti-Semitic doctrines are common place throughout Mosques in the West. Few Muslims bother to criticise these practices and fewer still will do anything to try and reform their so-called 'faith'. What kind of ideology is without a reformation, self criticism or searching analysis ? Is it a faith or an intolerant cult ? 

Fatah sums up the intolerant nature of Islam: "You have been lied to for centuries. Muslims need to educate themselves about Islam, not proselytize their religion to non-Muslims. It is time for them to read the truth about Islamic history......They should stop glorifying the politicization of Islam, a phenomenon which has produced a panaroma of tragedies and bloodshed..."

ISIS and the new Caliphate is the manifestation of true Islam. ISIS and Islam are both without borders. The Moslem Caliphate like spilt water on a flat surface, will continue to spread until confronted by obstacles and immovable forces. The Western world is certainly not going to do anything to slow down the expansion of this new Caliphate.   

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Why the Gospel is so deformed within the Koran

Muhammad stole Christian cultish beliefs not the real Gospel.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Koran openly plagiarizes – poorly it should be said – much of the Torah. Judaic theology is thus corrupted for Muhammadan usage. The same is true of the Moslem plunder of the Christian gospel, attempted perhaps at a lesser rate than that of the Old Testament. There are 2 important points to consider in the Moslem corruption of the Christian texts and their inclusion in the gibberish of the Koran.

The first is that part of Muhammad's band of brigands at one time fled to Christian Ethiopia where, in good Christian fashion, they were ironically protected from their Meccan persecutors. Christians would be accorded no such tolerance by Muhammadans of course as the cult of Mecca would soon begin a 1400 Jihad of Christian slaughter and rape. In Ethiopia the Moslems or Muhammadans would have picked up scraps and bits of the Gospel. Being illiterate, their recounting of such verses was bound to be imprecise and garbled. Their bards and those who helped inform the Koran, would have supplied this apocryphal text.

Secondly, there existed in Muhammad's Arabia, quite a few 'heretical' Christian sects. Mary worship and even idolatory was widespread. Other forms of perverted Christianity were also rife. There was no 'Catholic' ideal of Christianity as presented today. Christian theology was riven and disputed. The cult of Muhammad invariably would have come into contact with these heretical sects and would have appropriated their incorrect ideas about the Christian faith into their own belief systems. The Koran is in the main after-all, a statement of supremacy, as to why the Jewish and Christian faiths are incorrect and immoral; and why the Koran and Muhammadism is the only 'correct' view of theology.

The Muhammadans incorporated many Christian superstitions into the Koran, wrongly believing them to be true Gospel. Few Christians who actually understood the veracity of the Gospels converted to the Muhammad's cult. By 632 AD most Christians in Arabia, were either dead or exiled. Some of Muhammad's sex-slaves, Mary the Copt for example, were within the Moslem cult; and most likely had some appreciation of the true nature of the gospel. But their influence was marginal and temporary. What enters the Koran is the superstition and invalidated forms of cultish-Christian belief, which were common in the various sects which populated Muhammadan Arabia. The true gospel never makes an appearance to either Muhammad or his Koranic scribblers.

[From Goldsack, Chapter 3, on the Gospels in the Koran]

that many other of the doctrines of the Qur'an such as the denial of the death of Christ, the resolving the Christian Trinity into a tri-theism consisting of the Father, the Son and the Virgin Mary were derived by Muhammad from the Gnostic and other heretical sects of Christians who flourished in Arabia in his time....much of the Qur'an can be traced to Apocryphal Christian sources; whilst the Christian reader will also perceive how false is the claim that the former "confirms" the preceding scriptures - the Taurat and Injil..”

See also resource

This is why the Christian gospel is so mis-shapened, mal-formed and degraded within Mein Koran.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Forster and the 19th century Anglican view of Mahometism

The cult of Muhammad - now deemed by smart people to be a 'religion'.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Anglican Reverend Forster who wrote an informative work on Mahomet or Muhammad [1876] was no friend of the Catholics. He devotes an entire chapter – in good English Anglican tradition and exaggeration – on the tyranny of 'Popery'. As deluded as Weber's “Protestant Work Ethic”, in which 1000 years of Medieval invention and change is studiously ignored, or Gibbon's claim that Christianity 'pacified' Rome and caused its 'Fall'. Rome never fell, it was carved up into 3 Germanic kingdoms, and it died a thankful and belated death due to civil war, inflation, bureaucracy, taxation and corruption. The benefits of despotic governance that everyone seems so besotted by in the 21rst century.

Forster quotes Church-hater Gibbon in assessing the cult of Muhammad. Basically Gibbon rightly observes that Mahometism is a debased, degraded form of uncivilized cult worship, devoid of anything uplifting or intelligent.

The cult uber alles. 

Forster also goes to pains to show that Mahometism simply stole from the Bible. Much of the garbled gibberish that makes up the Koran is a warped regurgitation of what is found in the holy book. One example amongst hundreds suffices in which Paul's Chapter 12 in Corinthians 1, is bastardized and parodied within the Koran, obviously by scribes who were unfamiliar with the actual content. 

The actual text of Paul's letter is here.  It bears no resemblance to the Jihadic utterance above which is a threat against both the Jews and Christians. 

Forster rightly condemns Mahometism for what it truly is – a cult of violence, plagiarism, illogicality, hate and war. I doubt he would be invited to polite dinner parties in today's multicultural, Islamophiliac London. 

Friday, August 08, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Forster and Koranic plagiarism. Theft is now theological truth!

Only an academic or Moslem could defend Koranic plagiarism.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Koran, Muhammad's madness named 'Recital', is mainly composed of two parts. The first is the vast pillaging from the Bible, usually incorrectly, and with attribution to HuBaal the Lord moon deity of Mecca. Local Bedouin poems and verses, long in existence, were also appropriated en masse and thrown as a jumble-mash into the Koran. The short 'Suras' are evidence of this. The second purpose of the Koran is to demand obeisance and slavery to Muhammad [in the name of HuBaal], whilst demonizing the untermensch Jew and Christian. 1600 verses of hate speech attest t this fact.

Forster in his work, Mahometanism: A Study, discusses Koranic plagiarism, which is so rife and obvious, that only Moslems and Phd Marxist Academics in Western lower-education schools could miss it, he writes:

..among the many marks discernible in the Koran of designed and studied plagiarism from the Scripture.”

You don't need to be an evangelical crank to make this claim. Forster goes on to list page after page the plagiarism of the Koran.

Western 'experts' deem theft the highest form of revealed theological truth.  

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The Koran and Old Testament have nothing in common

Another Moslem-Marxist lie. The OT is quite distinct, Moslem plagiarism notwithstanding.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

The Koran has nothing in common with either the Old or New Testament. It is of course quite similar in its dichotomous language and vicious system of punishment, to many ancient Bronze and early Iron age theologies. Given that ancient Arabia was culturally colonized by Babylonia, giving rise to the Babylonian Sin or Baal as the main Lord [allah] of Mecca; and the first Babylonian codex the system of 'an for an eye' [Sura 5:45] which is the mainstay of Sharia [along with stoning, crucifying, cutting off of limbs], the linkages between Bronze Age Mesopotamia with the wastelands of the Bedouin should not be a surprise.

The Old Testament is composed of 3 essential parts. The first are the laws, the thou-shalls and the shall nots, which are unique in world history. Parables and wisdom from Psalms, Sirach, Job and Proverbs reinforce proper attributes and virtue. The second is the most accurate history imaginable of the Bronze and Iron ages, as proven by archaeology and non Biblical extant literature, a compendium of life, kings, wars and empires; not to mention the geological proof of a global flood. The third part is that of prophecy and the visions, predictions and laments of the prophets, with much vivid suffering, soul-searching and questioning of divine intent. Jeremiah and Isiah are classic exemplars of this genre.

The Koran certainly has no similarity with the New Testament. The golden rule never makes an appearance in the Koran, and the examples of Christ and Muhammad are polar opposites, with Muhammad very much in the role as the antithesis or anti-Christ, in his actions, words and blood soaked life. There might be a passing similarity between the Koran and the Old Testament. But this is also facetious and inaccurate.

The Koran purloins Old Testament tracts, especially the life of Moses, usually misunderstanding the original text, corrupting it, and deciding that in any event the story simply supports the omniscience and power of the Meccan HuBaal [Allah]. While the plagiarism is rife, the Koranic theft of Old Testament material means that the thieves were not adequately acquainted with the subject matter.

The only similarity one can see in reading Mein Koran and the Old Testament is the list of do's and do not's. But here the difference is stark. In the Old Testament the Hebrews, who are supposed to be the priests for God, in their zeal to disobey and worship idols, or ignore the commandments, are routinely punished for their misdeeds and unbelief. The prophets spend a great deal of energy and activity in trying to force the lost Hebrew sheep back to the good shepherd; or to issue forth declamations of disaster if repentance is not soon at hand. In any event the subject matter is the conduct of Hebrews, and those who should be following God; and what will happen if the Lord is rejected.

The Koran is entirely dissimilar. The history is meagre and disjointed. There are no prophets. The injunctions of woe are directed solely at Jews, Christian, unbelievers as well as those Moslems who are not following the Koran closely enough. The most important theme of the Koran is that Moslems must faithfully and completely follow the Koran and Muhammad's demands. Non-Moslems are to be destroyed both in this life by Moslems; and shall be tortured and committed to hell-fire by HuBaal or Allah in the next. Yet the Koran is also quite clear that Moslems must be nice to fellow cult members. It is expected that all Moslems will eventually, fully return to the totalitarian dogma of the Koran and Sharia.

The Old Testament's legal code is of course not the same as the Koran's. The 'eye for an eye' comes out of Babylon and is the mainstay of Moslem judicial procedure. This is why there is still widespread in the Moslem world such absurd physical violence and death in contravention of Koranic-Sharia law. Nothing has changed since 1750 BC Babylon. In the Old Testament this Bronze Age devotion to violence as a just punishment, is superseded by the 10 commands of Moses. Violence is still apparent – stoning, and even death for Christ and others who are claimed to be false prophets or who break the code of the Temple – but this is tempered in comparison with the blood demanded by Moslem Sharia.

Thankfully the New Testament abrogates the violence of the Old, by demanding a new vision of the human, the ending of blood in resolving disputes, and the sanctity of life, even of those condemned. You will never see the articles of the New Testament within the Bronze Age legal codex of Islam. Never.  

Monday, August 04, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Moslems never tolerate Christian Churches and Shrines

Muhammad's cult tears them down.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

When Moslems invade, conquer, or settle en-masse in a given area, infidel monuments are eradicated. Churches, artwork, libraries, the Twin Towers, or any artifice which expresses a prominent and important non-Koranic view of the world is disposed of. When the Moslem Jihad irrupted in its fascist zeal in 632 AD from the uncivilized wastes of moon-worshipping Bedouin country, and spread like a cancer from Syria to Southern France, some 30.000 churches were pulled-down, or converted into mosques. Today 'intellectuals' with Phd's would define such atrocity as an expression of inter-faith harmony and a 'golden age' of Moslem architecture.

In another article I have listed a partial account of Moslem annihilation of Infidel shrines. Many more could be added. Two of the holiest Christian sites in history were used by Moslems – the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, and the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople.  The latter is now a museum.  

Holy Sepulchre

Destroyed in 1009 AD by the Moslem caliph Hakim. It was a primary factor in motivating Western Catholics to launch the Crusades. The destruction of this Christian shrine was accompanied by a vicious persecution of non-Moslem Dhimmis throughout the caliphate. The church was rebuilt by the Crusaders during the 12th century. After the expulsion of the Europeans from the Holy Land in 1292, large sums of money were given to the occupying Turks to allow pilgrim access and site maintenance. European pilgrimages became an important source of money for the city and its Moslem masters.

The Hagia Sophia

The Hagia Sophia was an Eastern Orthodox church built under the supervision of Byzantine Emperor, Justinian, during the years 532-537 AD, until Constantinople was conquered by the Muslim Turks and the Christian church converted into the Ayasofya Mosque in 1453 AD. This 6thcentury Byzantine church was used over a thousand years later as a model for many of the Ottoman mosques; including the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (completed 1616 AD), the Şehzade Mosque (completed 1548 AD), the Süleymaniye Mosque (completed 1557 AD), the Rüstem Pasha Mosque (completed 1563 AD), and the Kılıç Ali Paşa Mosque (completed 1580 AD). It remains as a museum today.

Academics and 'experts' have determined that demolishing shrines, charging ransom to enter the rebuilt [at your cost] pilgrimage site, and converting sacred structures into mosques whose work is performed by second-class Jewish and Christian slaves, manifests a wonderfully tolerant and open society, devoid of hate and bile.

Today in Iraq we have just around Mosul and stretching out to the West and South, at least 45 churches destroyed by the Moslem Fascists ISIS. Not a word in the main-stream media. Nary a demonstration anywhere in the world, by 'moderate' Moslems declaiming against the eradication of Christianity in its ancient heartland. I would guess that most Moslems are proud, happy, drenched in a supremacist neo-Nazi glow of inviolate glory; as their cult follows Sura 5:33:

The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.”

You won't hear 'experts' and academics repeat the above Jihadic refrain, even as Moslems kill, execute, humiliate and crucify Christians.

Saturday, August 02, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The Koran is rather clear about ripping apart Jews and Christians

No ethical code means a totalitarian paganism.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Why do Moslems murder Christians? Too many are ignorant of the Meccan cult's impetus and energy. The question is answered by Moslem liturgy and its founder; and is expressed in a 1400 year Jihad by the cult of Submission against 'People of the Book' – the competitors to Muhammadism. As with Jews, Christians can only be tolerated if they submit to their Moslem masters. The superiority of Christianity in both theological and civilizational terms cannot be tolerated by Moslems. There is no desire for accommodation or harmony within the cult of Mecca.

Islam is the construct of Fuehrer worship, in which the Meccan Baal known as the Lord or ilah of the Arab tribes; is conflated with, and at times in the Koran replaced by, the personage of Muhammad. As with Hitler, Stalin and other evolutionists, atheist or fascist-totalitarian leaders, total control was the key objective of Muhammad's program. Rape, killing, plunder, sex-slavery, polygamy, and accruing gold and silver were the main concerns in the lust for complete power. All the easier to pay off brigands and thugs who follow the program – the mercenaries of the cult. Ethics do not make an appearance in the book Recital [Koran], unless you believe that being nice to Moslems and 'ruthless' to non-Moslems is an ethical code. The only 'nice' phrases about Jews and Christians [about half a dozen]; are linked to their complete submission to Moslems. Juxtaposed against this are 1600 verses of hate speech against the 'inferior apes and pigs' of the 'Book'.

Sura 79 in the Koran for example is titled 'Tearing out'. Tearing out what you might ask ? The weeds of Christ's parable of the seed ? Tearing out our prejudices and egos? Tearing out Christ's log from our own eye ? Tearing out the demons which possess our flesh ? Of course not. For Moslems you tear out the hearts of Christians and Jews. If the average Moslem, raised in the usual illiterate, non-culture of a deformed Moslem society reads Sura 79 they naturally assume that 'god' has pre-ordained the destruction of Jews and Christians. So why not kill them ?

If you don't believe in the Lord Allah, doom is upon you.


By those (angels) who pull out (the souls of the disbelievers and the wicked) with great violence;


And by those angels who arrange to do the Commands of their Lord, (so verily, you disbelievers will be called to account).

Allah will give 'recompense' to the Jews and Christians who rejected the word of Muhammad:


But when there comes the greatest catastrophe (i.e. the Day of Recompense, etc.),


The Day when man shall remember what he strove for,


And Hell-fire shall be made apparent in full view for (every) one who sees,


Then, for him who Tagha (transgressed all bounds, in disbelief, oppression and evil deeds of disobedience to Allah).


Verily, his abode will be Hell-fire;

Transgression in Islam simply means to disobey Muhammadan or Koranic-Sharia law. That is it. It does not mean 'transgressing' an ethical code. None exists in the Koran to transgress. Koranic-Muhammadan law is simple: follow whatever Muhammad says and does. Period. For Jews and Christians not doing so means that angels will rip out your hearts. To the average Moslem this 'godly command' surely gives them license to kill the hated Jew and Christian ?

Saturday, August 02, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Christians wiped out in Iraq - and wither the Vatican ?

Say nothing, do nothing, believe in nothing....

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

In both the confessing and evangelical Churches there are too many brain-dead apologists for the Meccan cult of death, dedicated as it is, to the complete eradication of Christianity. The rot in the confessing and professing Church starts at the top in the Vatican and streams down in great waves to the local clergy. The entire structure is terrified to criticize Muhammad's cult. Supine, stupid and stunned they gape while hundreds of thousands of Christians in the birthplace of their religion are being lined up for a faith-genocide by Moslems.

A report on Christians in Iraq and in particular Mosul, from Catholic.org. Deacon Keith Fournier is Founder and Chairman of Common Good Foundation and Common Good Alliance. A married Roman Catholic Deacon of the Diocese of Richmond, Virginia, he and his wife Laurine have five grown children and six grandchildren, He serves as the Director of Adult Faith Formation at St. Stephen, Martyr Parish in Chesapeake, VA. He is also a human rights lawyer and public policy advocate.

He writes:

Since taking over Mosul on June 10, ISIS has destroyed, occupied, converted to mosques, converted to ISIS headquarters or shuttered all 45 Christian institutions in Mosul.The following is the complete list of the Christian institutions in Mosul, grouped by denomination.

Syriac Catholic Church:

1.Syrian Catholic Diocese - Maidan Neighborhood, Mosul 
2.The Old Church of the Immaculate - Maidan Neighborhood, Mosul (The church goes back to the eighth century AD) 
3.The New Church of the Immaculate - Maidan Neighborhood 
4.Church of Mar (Saint) Toma - Khazraj Neighborhood 
5.Museum of Mar (Saint) Toma - Khazraj Neighborhood 
6.Church of Our Lady of the Annunciation - Muhandiseen Neighborhood 
7.Church of the Virgin of Fatima - Faisaliah Neighborhood 
8.Our Lady of Deliverance Chapel - Shifaa Neighborhood 
9.The House of the Young Sisters of Jesus - Ras Al-Kour Neighborhood 
10.Archbishop's Palace Chapel - Dawasa Neighborhood

Syriac Orthodox Church:

1.Syrian Orthodox Archdiocese - Shurta Neighborhood 
2.The Antiquarian Church of Saint Ahodeeni - Bab AlJadeed Neighborhood 
3.Mar (Saint) Toma Church and cemetery, (the old Bishopric) - Khazraj Neighborhood 
4.Church of The Immaculate (Castle) - Maidan Neighborhood 
5.Church of The Immaculate - Shifaa Neighborhood 
6.Mar (Saint) Aprim Church - Shurta Neighborhood 
7.St. Joseph Church - The New Mosul Neighborhood

Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East:

1.Diocese of the Assyrian Church of the East - Noor Neighborhood 
2.Assyrian Church of the East, Dawasa Neighborhood 
3.Church of the Virgin Mary (old rite) - Wihda Neighborhood

Chaldean Church of Babylon:

1.Chaldean Diocese - Shurta Neighborhood 
2.Miskinta Church - Mayassa Neighborhood 
3.The Antiquarian Church of Shimon alSafa - Mayassa Neighborhood 
4.Church of Mar (Saint) Buthyoon - Shahar AlSouq Neighborhood 
5.Church of St. Ephrem, Wady AlAin Neighborhood 
6.Church of St. Paul - Majmooaa AlThaqafiya District 
7.The Old Church of the Immaculate (with the bombed archdiocese)- Shifaa Neighborhood 
8.Church of the Holy Spirit - Bakir Neighborhood 
9.Church of the Virgin Mary - Drakziliya Neighborhood 
10.Ancient Church of Saint Isaiah and Cemetery - Ras AlKour Neighborhood 
11.Mother of Aid Church - Dawasa Neighborhood 
12.The Antiquarian Church of St. George- Khazraj Neighborhood 
13.St. George Monastery with Cemetery - Arab Neighborhood 
14.Monastery of AlNasir (Victory) - Arab Neighborhood 
15.Convent of the Chaldean Nuns - Mayassa Neighborhood 
16.Monastery of St. Michael - Hawi Church Neighborhood 
17.The Antiquarian Monastery of St. Elijah - Ghazlany Neighborhood

Armenian Orthodox Church:

1.Armenian Church - Maidan Neighborhood 
2.The New Armenian Church - Wihda Neighborhood

Evangelical Presbyterian Church:

1.Evangelical Presbyterian Church - Mayassa Neighborhood

Latin Church:

1.Latin Church and Monastery of the Dominican Fathers and Convent of Katrina Siena Nuns - Sa'a Neighborhood 
2.Convent of the Dominican Sisters, - Mosul AlJadeed Neighborhood 
3.Convent of the Dominican Sisters (AlKilma Monastery) - Majmooaa AlThaqafiya District 
4.House of Qasada AlRasouliya (Apostolic Aim) (Institute of St. John the Beloved)


1.Christian Cemetery in the Ekab Valley which contains a small chapel.

All courtesy of Islam, the cult of death.

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Bookmark and Share

As with the Nazis, Moslem racist hatred of the Jew runs wide and deep

Racism is not a religion.

by Ibn Sufi al Kitab

Full Article

Moslem fascism embedded in its liturgical books, demands the absolute destruction of Jews and Christians. If you read Muhammadan theology for yourself, separated from lame-brain media brainwashing, and public school disinformation; this fact will make itself present in a most sickening and virulent manner. Consider some of the 'commentaries' or Hadiths, which run alongside Mein Koran, by Moslem 'theologians' [ie cult propagandists], such as Ishaq and Tabari.

Ishaq was an early 8th century propagandist for the Abbasid totalitarianism, named by some as a 'Caliphate'. He wrote the first biography of Fuehrer Muhammad, who in the eyes of the moon deity Allah, was the man uber-alles. Born some 75 years or so after the mad-man's death, Ishaq put together accounts of Muhammad's actions during his reign of terror, from second-hand sources. It makes unpleasant reading.


"Do you love Jews and their religion, you liver-hearted ass, and not Muhammad? Their religion will never march with ours.... Jews make false professions about Islam. So Allah sent down: 'Satan wishes to lead them astray."


"Allah increases their sickness. A tormented doom awaits the Jews. Allah said, 'They are mischief makers. They are fools. The Jews deny the truth and contradict what the Apostle has brought. I will mock them and let them continue to wander blindly.'"

Tabari, applauded by big-brains as the 'most important Moslem historian ever', was a mid-9th century Moslem who extended the Hadith commentaries. As Shakespeare was a Tudor propagandist, so too was Tabari a product of his times and his 'history' is nothing less than a fictional recitation of Moslem supremacy [much of Shakespeare should be viewed in the same vein].

Below are some verses from Ishaq and Tabari related to the Jews as viewed by Moslems and Muhammad. Notice the bile, the hate, the intolerance, the lust for their destruction.

Next we will hear that Nazi theological apologist Rosenberg, was 'a great historian'.


"A notable Jew spoke to the Apostle, twisting his tongue. He attacked Islam and reviled it, so Allah sent down, 'Allah knows best about your enemies. Some of the Jews change words from their contexts and say: "We hear and disobey," twisting their tongues and attacking the religion so Allah cursed them.'"

Tabari VIII:121

"Ali struck the Jew with a swift blow that split his helmet, neck protector, and head, landing in his rear teeth. And the Muslims entered the city. Muhammad conquered the [Jewish] neighborhood. Safiyah was brought to him, and another woman with her. Bilal led them past some of the Jews we had slain including the woman's dead husband. When she saw them, the woman with Safiyah cried out, slapped her face, and poured dust on her head. When Allah's Prophet saw her, he said, 'Take this she-devil away from me!'"

Tabari VIII:130

"The Messenger said during his final illness, 'Two religions cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter, then sent to the Jews, saying: 'Allah has given permission for you to be expelled; for I have received word that the Prophet said that two religions cannot coexist in Arabia."


"Khaybar [Jewish oasis town] was stormed by the Apostle's squadron, fully armed, powerful, and strong. It brought certain humiliation with Muslim men in its midst. We attacked and they met their doom. Muhammad conquered the Jews in fighting that day as they opened their eyes to our dust."


"We cannot accept the oaths of Jews. Their infidelity is so great they swear falsely."


"The Jews were made to come down, and Allah's Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men."

Tabari VIII:40

"The Messenger commanded that furrows should be dug in the ground for the Qurayza [a Jewish tribe]. Then he sat down. Ali and Zubayr began cutting off their heads in his presence."

Tabari VIII:38

"The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims."

Much more exists in the 'histories' of Tabari and Ishaq related to hate speech, Jihad, and the murdering of Jews and Christians. At least we can thank them for their frank honesty. We can see that Muhammad murdered Jews with military might, trickery, his own hands and slaughtered innocents, whilst raping Jewish women. Moslems and their devoted multi-cult minions characterize such actions as 'religious', 'prophetic', and 'ethical'. What a pathetic group of brain-addled morons they must be. 


Reform the cult of Islam and Islamic States
Click on the Banner below to help Persecuted Christians, violently attacked, raped and killed by Moslems, in Moslem dominated countries and regions:

Islam is a cult, not a religion.  Its genesis is the political-theocratic orders of the Bronze and Iron ages.  The doctrines of 'Submission' are barbaric, immoral, irrational and pagan, not to mention fascistic in the real sense of that abused term.  

Islam  never has produced even a tithe of the  innovations, inventions, tools, and  breakthroughs in the realms of art, writing, philosophy, politcal- economy, science, medicine, governance,  social welfare, justice, law and  free-will rationality, as wrought by the Middle  Ages in European Christendom.   

The Fascist theology of Muhammadanism.

Paxton's definition of Fascism boils down to a few essentials:
  1. Fascism is a political project which is formed to reverse a perceived decline. [Islam – check]
  2. It is violent and bloody. [Islam - check]
  3. It is a cult, in which the cult must be obeyed by all who are ruled by the cult. [Islam - check]
  4. The cult employs myths of purity and greatness, of the race, or state in question. [Islam - check]
  5. Ideals around rationality, democracy, individualism, and freedom need to be abandoned. [Islam - check]
  6. Following the plan and diktats of the cult are the individual's only responsibilities. [Islam - check]

Paxton's identification of Fascism as a mass movement, premised on some absurd idea of 'purity' and on violence, is certainly correct. It is indeed the cult uber alles. One can go further of course in refining what is a Fascist movement.  In a 1995 essay titled "Eternal Fascism",  [link] the Italian writer and academic Umberto Eco adopts a detailed list of Fascist ideological components. For Eco, Fascism is not a coherent political program per-se, but a set of organizing principles specific to the culture in question: He lists 14 main features of the Fascist program...... more

Mock Islam daily and often.  An intolerant pagan-fascist cult deserves no respect.

Muhammad cartoons.  If Muhammad was a 'prophet' so too was Adolf and Josef.  All of the French cartoons are here
Muhammad's favorite wife - Aisha.  6 year old girl married to a 53 year old 'man'......clever.  Younger than his own daughter.  Moslems deny this.  But sadly for them, the Koran, the Hadiths and Moslem historiography confirm that Muhammad married a mere child and consummated it when she was 9.

Muhammad in the full glare of history.  Why won't Moslems inquire about who this man really was ? Terrified of the Truth ?

Fitna and the Moslem imperative to fight all Unbelievers until the entire world is free of the Infidel.

Where did this cult named Submission or  Islam come from ?

Arab Historian and Moslem-apologist Hitti detailing the moon deity of Mecca, Hub'Allah as the Al-Lah of the Koran.

"Philip Hitti was an Arab historian, whose opus 'History of the Arabs' originally created in 1937, is without much doubt the most important, and most deeply flawed work on the history of the Arabs and by consequence Islam. A summary review of his work is posted here. The main strength of Hitti's book is his pre-Islamic history which is a fascinatingly detailed look at pre-Muhammad Arabia......

Celestial worship
On page 60 Hitti describes the sky pantheon which infected Arabian pagan beliefs:
“The religion of South Arabia was in its essence a planetary astral system in which the cult of the moon-god prevailed. The moon, known in Hadramawt as Sin, to the Minaeans as Wadd (love or lover, father), to the Sabaeans as Almaqah (the health-giving god?)....He was conceived of as a masculine deity and took precedence over the sun, Shams, who was his consort.....From this celestial pair sprang the many other heavenly bodies considered divine. The North Arabian al-Lat, who figured in the Koran, may have been another name for the sun-goddess.” [p.60]

Baal was the Sky God or Thunder God of various Near Eastern pre-Christian era tribes. The Hittites and Canaanites worshipped the power of the Thunder God. The Assyrians and Sumerians the omnipotence of the Sky God. Baal or Hubal would be akin to Thor in Nordic legend, or Zeus and Jupiter in ancient Greece or Rome. It is not a surprise that Baal was also worshipped in pre-Muhammad Arabia:
“Ba'l represented the spirit of springs and underground water and must have been introduced into Arabia at the same time as the palm tree....The Bedouin's astral beliefs centered upon the moon, in whose light he grazed his flocks. Moon-worship implies a pastoral society, whereas sun-worship represents a later agricultural stage....Hence Wadd (Koran 71:22), the moon-good who stood at the head of Minaean pantheon....Al-Lat in al-Taif was represented by a square stone...” [p. 97]
Baal is of course quite dissimilar to the Christian ideals of 'god' though he did have a human form – much like Zeus.
“Hubal (from Aramaic for vapour, spirit), evidently the chief deity of al-Kabah, was represented in human form....The pagan Kabah, which became the palladium of Islam, was an unpretentious cube-like (hence the name) building of primitive simplicity....serving as a shelter for a black meteorite which was venerated as a fetish.” [p. 100] More

Why Islam is a cult

A cult is not a religion. A religion to be worthy of the name, must support the following 4 ideals; free-will; rationality (or faith through reason); the Golden Rule; and good works towards any and all. We cannot forget that Calvin`s cult in 16 century Geneva denied free will and enquiry. The peasants simply had to shut up and obey the militant cult. Lutheranism embraced pre-destination and denounced human free-will, goodness, and works of faith. Luther created Calvin. Modern secularism, so hateful of Judeo-Christianity, worships material dialecticism and scientism, no matter how perverted, irrational or distorted the scientism might be. Free will and rational skepticism – at least for the hoi polloi peasantry – is beyond the pale in a world worshipping the cult of science and abstract, obtruse and often times utterly vapid materialist-narcissist philosophies.

Cults do not possess nor desire golden means. They are erected as extremist ideals bent on the subversion of reality and individuality. We ridicule ourselves and our common-sense by ascribing the word religion to the cult of Muhammad.


If you read the history of Mohammed and the formation of his cult, two obvious observations come to mind. First Islam is based on a moon cult, suffused with some Judaic notions of monotheism [see here for why Islam is a moon cult]. Second, the racism, supremacism, violence, calls to war, the innumerable campaigns, the pilfering and rape of caravans and towns, and the code of obedience, all foreshadow Nazism and the modern pagan cults embodied in the leaderships of Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin. 

Since no-one in the educational or media establishments bothers to read about Mohammed, these uncomfortable truths – the war, the hate, the bile, the carnage, the injunction to conquer the world – are quietly untold. But that is the real historical Mohammed. He was not a great man, as Time Magazine ejaculated when assigning status to the most important individuals in history. Mohammed was a monster, a man who created a cult, which as Churchill remarked, inculcated in its votaries a primitive, and ruthless passion – the scourge of civilisation. 

Books Reviewed

Robert R. Reilly, 'The Closing of the Muslim Mind'. The Mutazilite doctrine of church and state separation and the necessity to use reason to find faith, flowered for only 50 years. The Islamic counter-reformation was harsh and uncompromising. The three main schools of Islamic theology grouped as Asharism [after an important 9  century Sunni teacher]; and a fourth named Hanbalism [named after Hanbali an immoderate and extremist fundamentalist of the 8 century]; took over:

"In the second year of the reign of Caliph Ja'afar al-Mutawakkil (847-861), the tables were turned....Holding Mutazilite doctrine became a crime punishable by death. The Mutazilites were expelled from court...and their works largely destroyed....the long process of dehellenization and ossification had begun."

It took the Asharites some 200 years to expunge Mutazilitism from Islam. Some Mutazilite philosophers still appeared in the 10th and 11th century in the forms of Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes. But they were weak and without followers in a Muslim world quickly cementing Asharite and Hanbalist fundamentalism into every aspect of Islamic life. Free will was destroyed. Rationality mocked.

Child Abuse

Child sex is common in the Islamic world. It comes from imitating the rape by Mohammed of Aysha – a mere 9 year old innocent. For Muslims, Mohammed is the ultimate symbol of male greatness. Ergo sex with children is not only permitted but practised. Mass marriages of 13 year old child-brides are common in Gaza, Lebanon and elsewhere. A 13 year old girl in Muslim culture is ready to produce Muslim male offspring – under the guidance of an older male Muslim of course.

"According to western standards, or any civilized standard, Mohammed’s marriage to Aysha and having sex with her at the age of nine years is a crime called paedophilia.  However, Muslims call it an ordinary marriage and justify it on the supposition that girls in hot countries tend to reach sexual maturity faster than in cold countries. Muslims assume, without any evidence, that  Aysha had a menstruation before her marriage and conclude that Mohammed had sex with an adult aged nine years!  This justification by Muslims is an indication of how they understand maturity; simply it is sexual maturity and has nothing to do with the mind."

Conflicts in Islam

Jew-hate is racism.
As simple as that. This racist inclination infects the Arab-Muslim and UN world. The extent of this immorality is so pervasive that most Westerners accept the myth that Gazan Arabs are somehow `Palestinians` - a word created in the 1960s by Arafat and the fascist PLO. Palestinian Arabia is a myth designed to create an aura of historical legitimacy for a group of people who don't have any. It is the Arabs of course who are squatting on territory which was a part of the ancient Jewish kingdoms, which predate the Muslim invasions by some 1700 years. Yet most Arabs and Muslims know nothing about Islamic, Arab or Jewish history. One third to one-half of the Arab world is illiterate. No wonder the Meccan moon cult fascism is so highly prized


The Crusades were one of the most important events in our history – and one of the most glorious. They saved civilisation. There is little doubt about this. As another writerstates so correctly:

"So I'll say for the record that despite the excesses that took place as they were waged, the Crusades were a great moment in Christian history—as the Church has recognized by canonizing so many Crusaders (King Louis IX and Bernard of Clairvaux are two well-known examples), and the current cringing surrender many urge before Islam is a sickening, un-Christian scandal—on the order of the suicidally stupid Children's Crusade. Any religion that will not fight in its own defense deserves to be persecuted—and there are plenty abroad in the Muslim world who will happily oblige it."

Islam or Mohammedanism as it should be called [or the cult of Mohammed], is a militant barbarous paganism. Why wouldn't you fight it?


Weimar Germany fell to the Nazi's due to many reasons, including economic stagnation; extreme nationalism; a victim narrative; apathy and ruthless, terrorist tactics. The singular innovation of the Nazi party was to attack its enemies using the ferocious 'brownshirts' or terrorist milita, whilst controlling democratic elections. Islamist jihadists and fascists are adept at using the same methods with the same skill to subvert pluralism; quiet 'moderates'; and develop a terror state.

real world as well the philosophical world of Islamic doctrine makes this obvious. Islamic thinkers and leaders, those truly committed to an Islamic state, have no interest in pluralism of any variety. Islamic states are one party affairs with no democratic, party, or religious diversity or opposition. They are Nazified creations – with the added power of a melded church and state complex, something even the Nazis did not achieve. Consider some real world examples.


Most people would be astonished by this. The drop in Moslem babies is of course great news. Islam, which is presented by the Western media as pacific, tolerant, sophisticated and socially cohesive is of course the opposite in reality. Vitally as the Moslem world urbanizes, its birth rate has fallen by over ½ in the aggregate. Islamic politicians in Turkey and Iran for example have set 2040 as the 'end date' of their so-called 'civilisations'. Within 30 years the decline in both Turkic and Persian-Mede fertility will herald an irreversible decline in both populations. The same is true elsewhere in the Moslem world.

The UN’s  World Population Prospects Report makes it clear the fertility decline in the Moslem world is indeed a world-wide phenomenon. The report compares birth rates from about 1970 to 2003-7. The analysis reveals that the largest Moslem states are becoming infertile and are approaching European and Japanese infertility rates. For example in Indonesia which has the world’s largest Muslim population [230 million], the fertility rate has dropped from 5.6 in 1970, to 2.02 today, which is below the replacement level. The same UN assessment sees huge declines in Bangladesh (from 6.5 to 2.2) and Malaysia (4.7 to 2.4) during this same period. By 2050, even Pakistan is expected to reach a replacement-level fertility rate down from 7.1 in 1970, and 3.8 in 2005.


For most of modern history we can issue forth this truism: the left wing elements of the modern world, including academia, unions, bureaucrats, the media, political opportunists and self-appointed experts have always aligned themselves with fascism and totalitarianism. So it goes with Islam. It is a peculiar and perverse fascination. The two creeds – socialist Marxism and fascist Islam - have prima facie, nothing in common. Yet one common element unites these two perverse and destructive ideologies. It is their hatred of the Christian West and the modern world. In fact the ideology of Islam resonates with communitarian Marxism, and there is much in similarity between extreme socialism and the fascist totalitarian construct of an Islamic state. Indeed the entire Islamic world, save Iraq and Afghanistan now under Western imperial domination, is a broad and ugly swathe of Islamic Marxist orientation. Perhaps the Western left sees its salvation and continued relevance in the power of the Islamic model – which is another variant of extreme socialism. 

A hatred of Christianity, modernity and individuality permeates both concepts.....

Golden Age Myths

We are constantly told a lie that Moorish Spain was a multicultural nirvana of unbounded development and civilisation. Even the Great Obama, that most important of humans, has rendered his divine opinion in various speeches which refer to 'Cordoba', the Moorish capital as an example of inter-faith success, and a glorious period of learning in which all 'faiths' learnt from each other. It makes a nice UN advertisement, but this idea is of course almost wholly false. The Muslims invaded Spain in 710 AD because Visigothic Spain was rich, advanced, heavily engineered with crops, roads and aqueducts and urbanized. All of the supposed 'achievements' by the Moors were actually Visigothic. All of the architecture, save the Alhambra in Granada which was designed by a Jew, were Visigothic. The Spanish successor to Roman Hispania simply astonished the Arabs and Moors with its wealth and sophistication including of course the arts, the literature and engineering. We know this because the Arabs left records at their amazement over Spain's riches.

But today of course in our current dark age, the real history becomes rewritten and all credit for the advanced civilisation of Spain is rendered to the 'genius' of the Arabs, a group who have never in history developed an advanced society. The Arabs and Muslims were pretty good at either squatting or using 'Dhimmi' technology, money and people for the Islamic cult's benefit. That does take a certain amount of cunning and skill I suppose. But to conflate the destruction of Visigothic Spain and its use by Muslims with a 'Golden Age' is frighteningly inaccurate. As Mr. Seward reminds the reader, the life of the Dhimmi non-Muslim in Spain was one of fear, losing life, assets and money; being plundered, being raped, or being sold off into slavery:

"Every year the Christian territories were devastated, crops burnt, fruit trees cut down, buildings razed, livestock driven off and the inhabitants herded back to the slave-markets. Those who escaped were cowed by ingenious atrocities, the victims' heads being salted as trophies to impress the caliph's unruly subjects....The Reconquista was a holy war."

In the West

At the risk of going to jail for 'thought crimes', it is laughingly obvious to any who study the political-economy, that the cult of multiculturalism, was always destined to fail. Uni-cultures, premised on natural law rights, freedom, political representation, open-trade, and military preparedness survive. Multi-cults who posit the inane and immoral idea that all cultures are the same and that the history's of all people are 'similar and important' create states riven by group 'rights', ghetto mentalities and the destructiveness of state power. The multi-cult is the surest path for a state to force 'conformity', elevate its power to ensure 'equality of cultures', and indoctrinate its citizenry in the cult of the state, as it deposes and reduces the original majoritorian culture to a theology which not only must be rejected, but even criminalized. Thus, if you criticise the failure of a moon-cult from Mecca, and dare to argue that Muslim baths, worship rooms, and state-financed mosques are deleterious to the greater society, than you must be punished and imprisoned for hate crimes.


One of the great hoary myths is that all, most, or `the great majority`of Muslims are peaceful, unsupportive of Islamic fascism and quite willing to accommodate themselves to Western ways and mores. It is in this context that the recent Iranian elections are being reported. According to Western news outlets few in Iran want the Ahmadinejad gang and his Mullah friends in power. This is another lie. Fascisms never survive without widespread support – and international allies. My guess is that a large plurality of Iranians do support theocratic fascism. 

No one knows who voted for what in Iran but two things are clear. First, the Mousavi candidacy whilst marginally better than the Ahmadinejad cult and the Mullahs, was still an Islamist and fundamentalist proposition. A Western supporter and reformer he is not, and the Mullahs who run the country and who are selected and not elected, would have been unaffected by a Mousavi victory. Second, out of about 35 million voting age Iranians at least 20 million, and quite likely upwards of 25 million Iranian voters, accepted and supported the Ahmadinejad regime. This is the real story in Iran – the widespread acclamation that the Ahmadinejad regime enjoys. 

Islamic history

The Hajj means friction and denoted the rubbing of a black stone at the Meccan Kabaa shrine by females against their genitalia. This friction was thought to induce fertility by rubbing the holy rock against the woman's reproductive area. It would be hard to find a more irresolutely pagan practice than this, with perhaps child sacrifice being an exception. This pre-Muhammadan practice had existed for hundreds of years within Arabia dating to at least the birth of Christ. Post-Muhammad the Hajj signified the Moslem duty to journey to Mecca, to spend money, to enrich the locals, and to follow the timeless pagan Arab rituals of rock, stone, and devil worship, as well as circumambulating the Kabaa and kissing its black rock.

This was an ageless and important ceremony in pre-Muhammadan Mecca. Indeed the market square around the cube or Kabaa was infested with prostitution, and many historians speculate that sex orgies were a part of the ritualized offering to the black asteroid rock which was housed in the cube and which represented heavenly power. Rubbing the genitalia with such a rock might have been a prelude to a sexual offering.

In Muhammad and the Religion of Islam, published in 1984, historian John Gilchrist offers the reader a detailed glimpse into this pre-historical era of pagan Arabia. It is a world of superstition, demons, moon deities, celestial reverence, illiteracy, banditry, poverty and under-development. No civilisation worth the name existed there. As historian Gilchrist comments:

The ramial-jimar ceremony at Mina, like many other ceremonies in the Hajj, places a great emphasis on stones - further evidence of pagan Arab practices surviving to this day for the pre-Islamic idol-worshippers worshipped not only stones but had a stone-throwing ceremony in their rites. [Gilchrist, Mohammed, 1984]

Islamic Theology

Karahah sometimes spelled Kariha in the Koran, means 'hate', 'dislike' or 'averse to'. It is used in connection with the Unbelievers or those who reject Muhammad's commands and leadership. First, Moslems might not like fighting the Infidel but Allah wills them to do it. Remember humans have no free-will in Islam, only the Al-Lah moon deity possesses free-will. Second, Unbelievers must be fought since they 'hate' Muhammad's cult. Third, the Infidels are 'averse to' and quite 'dislike' the diktats of the El-Lah thing, and must be brought into line through coercion and intractable purpose. The Arabic word for hate permeates all sections of the Koran.

Al-Lah wills you to fight for him [or it]

2:216 Jihad (holy fighting in Allah's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know.

58:8 Have you not seen those who were forbidden to hold secret counsels, and afterwards returned to that which they had been forbidden, and conspired together for sin and wrong doing and disobedience to the Messenger (Muhammad SAW). And when they come to you, they greet you with a greeting wherewith Allah greets you not, and say within themselves: "Why should Allah punish us not for what we say?Hell will be sufficient for them, they will burn therein, and worst indeed is that destination!

61:9 He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad SAW) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammed SAW) hate (it).

10:82 "And Allah will establish and make apparent the truth by His Words, however much the Mujrimun (criminals, disbelievers, polytheists, sinners, etc.) may hate it."

The Koran

In 'The Encyclopedia of Islam', there are 3 scholars who are sourced in resolving the issue of the ordering of the Suras – Noldeke, Blachere and Weiss. These men went to the source material of the Koran, including the Hadiths, scripts, and writings which pre-dated the invention of the Koran. They sifted through Arabic and Muslim material and developed a definitive chronological order of the last Medinan Suras. Whilst there are some variations in their ordering, the lists in othe rdering of the Medinan, or latest Suras, are rather similar:

Weil: 2, 98, 62, 65, 22, 4, 8, 47, 57, 3, 59, 24, 63, 33, 48, 110, 61, 60, 58, 49, 66, 9, 5.

Noldeke and Blachere: 2, 98, 64, 62, 8, 47, 3, 61, 57, 4, 65, 59, 33, 63, 24, 58, 22, 48, 66, 60, 110, 49, 9, 5.

The 3 scholars are in broad agreement on the order of the last 'grouping' of Koranic Suras. From the list above it is clear that Suras 9 and 5 are the most important. Both are reviewed here and here. Other scholars such as Sir William Muir concur that 9 and 5 are the last two Suras. Sahih Bukhari, in his Hadiths, volume 6, book 60, # 129 (or 5.59.650) confirms this stating: "The last Sura that was revealed was Bara’…" Bara is Sura 9.

[un]Holy Koran !

It is amusing and disquieting when one receives emails from the Dhimmis – or Muslim lovers – screaming that Islam is peace and there is no compulsion in the Koran and that anyone who writes the truth about Islam is a racist, fascist, conservative Hitlerite etc. These Dhimmi-wits often cite Sura 2:256 which indeed does say, out of context, that there is no compulsion in religion. But what the Dhimmis don't understand is that in this single verse – the only one they can find in the entire Koran –  non-Muslims are assumed to be slaves and there is no compulsion towards your slaves. Why would there be ? Slaves work, toil and pay the jizya or slave-head tax. Why force revenue producing agents into being Islamic ?

As I wrote in reviewingSura 2, verse 256 is always held up to be the example of Islamic tolerance and love. This is however, entirely misleading. 2:256 says, “Let there be no compulsion in religion.” It is directly followed by 2:257 which makes it clear what 2:256 is really saying, “Allah is the Protector of those who have faith: from the depths of darkness He will lead them forth into light. Of those who reject faith the patrons are the Evil Ones: from light they will lead them forth into the depths of darkness. They will be Companions of the fire, to dwell therein (forever)"

It is obvious that 2:256 is referring to the fact that in Koranic theology the compulsion of slaves or Dhimmis is unnecessary, since the moon deity, Ali-ilah is going to send them to hell anyways. This is confirmed elsewhere in the same Sura where we have a dozen or more calls to Jihad:

90. Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you... 

191. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; 


Apparently Hub-Al[lah] the Moslem moon diety and 'ilah' or Lord of the pagan Gods was a racist. Racism abounds in the Koran, with Blacks and 'Black Faces' singled out as inferior. Muhammad stated that Blacks were stupid. Black slavery was an important economic crutch for the lighter skin Arabs in pre-Muhammadan Arabia. Most Arab families, like Muhammad's, had Black slave-servants, and much of the rather poor economic development of Arabia was premised in part on the work of Black slaves. Kufar or  Infidel was originally a word applied to African Blacks. Some 11 million of whom were transhipped to the Greater Arabian and Moslem empires over a 1100 year period. An unremarked upon catalogue of human misery.

To transship 11 million humans typically meant that 2 or 3 times that amount had to be 'found' and preyed upon. The death rate from capture to the initial stages of forced marches in chains is according to most historians, in the 50-60% range, meaning that 20 odd million Blacks over 1100 years were captured by Arab and Moslem flesh hunters and that about ½ of this total might have survived and made it to the northern Moslem realms. [to say nothing of the 10 million Whites taken by Moslems as slaves....]

vs. Christianity

Maybe moderate Muslims and their Marxist-PC cultist enablers can explain the following Koranic injunctions which demand the eradication of Christians:
  1. 2:190-193 Fight in the cause of God, those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out: For tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; But fight them not at the sacred Mosque unless they first fight you there; But if they fight you, Slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression."
  2. 2:216-217 Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not. They ask thee concerning fighting in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave (offense); but graver is it in the sight of God to prevent access to the path of God, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members. Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you back from your faith if they can. And if any of you turn back from their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in this life and in the Hereafter; they will be Companions of the Fire and will abide therein.
  3. 2:244-245 Then fight in the cause of God, and know that God heareth and knoweth all things. Who is he that will loan to God a beautiful loan, which God will double unto his credit and multiply many times? It is God that giveth (you) want or plenty, and to Him shall be your return.


The world of the Koran and of Islam is cleanly cleaved into two sections. On the one side are the great, the good, the faithful and the to be rewarded who follow Mohammed and his alter-ego, Allah. On the other side of the great divide are the Unbelievers, the Unjust, the Criminals, the Sinners, the Idolaters, the Pagans, the Damned, or anyone male or female, who does not follow the moon-cult and Koranic theology. Yes it really is that simple. There is no objective ethics within the Koran, just restatements of supremacism, racism and lurid tales of doom and eternal damnation for those who reject Mohammed's cult. That is basically the Koran in a nutshell. One of the most apposite phrases which clearly describes the intention of this cult is the following, written after the Mohammedan's had started their bloody imperialist domains in Arabia: 40-40: Whosoever does an evil deed, will not be requited except the like thereof, and whosoever does a righteous deed, whether male or female and is a true believer (in the Oneness of Allah), such will enter Paradise, where they will be provided therein (with all things in abundance) without limit.

This is the 'Golden Rule' in the Koran. When a Muslim says 'oh yeah, the Koran and Islam contain the Christian Golden Rule as well', they are liars. The phrase above is about as clear as one can get. 'Whosoever does a righteous deed [following the Koran in other words], and is a true believer [of Mohammed and the Koran], will enter Paradise.' I doubt that the theme of the Koran can be more clearly or easily expressed. Follow us and win earthly and heavenly salvation. Oppose us and die.

9-68 Allah has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allah has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

The cult of Islam | Scoop.it
All the new curated posts for the topic: The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Islam's hatred of Christianity and by extension, of Christmas

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
True Moslems must hate the symbols of Christianity. The Koran mandates such intolerance by first disavowing Christianity as pagan and criminal, and second by outlawing the veneration of any religious symbols. Therefore Moslems cannot abide by any Christian or Christmas symbol including the cross, a Christmas tree, a Christmas decoration, or the nativity. Most cities in the West have been cowed by the Moslem supremacists to remove public votives of Christian theology at Christmas time. Gone are stars on trees; nativity scenes; and even crosses. The Koran is very clear that Christians are polytheist criminals and must be killed, crucified, and humiliated to quote Sura 5:33. The Trinity is declared by the Koran to be a polytheism, and Christian symbols representations of that 'error'.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: The Allah thing - aka Muhammad - hates Christians
The Allah thing - aka Muhammad - hates Christians Koranic supremacism.

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
The Koran changes dramatically over time. When mad Mohammed was in Mecca trying to sell himself as a prophet in the line of Jewish and Christian tradition he was more accommodating of Christians. In fact much of his monotheistic program was of course stolen from the Jewish and Christian faiths. Once Mohammed was exiled from Mecca by his own tribe the Quraysh finding refuge in Medina, the Koran and Allah the moon guy's 'revelations' suddenly become much darker, more intolerant and violent. Islam becomes a jihadic enterprise with those who rejected the 'prophet' targeted for annihilation, including of course the followers of Christ who would not accept the illiterate Arab politician as the successor to the Jewish rabbi from Nazareth.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Christianophobia – Islam's hatred of Christians, Sura 4 [first part thereof]
Christianophobia – Islam

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
The Koran is a long anti-Christian, anti-Jew rant, replete with lurid calls of violence and killing. Supremacist theology negates a true religion. In Sura 4 or 'The Women', in the first 90 verses, one finds 30 Christianophic statements. Quite a large amount from a cult supposedly dedicated to world happiness.

Most of this Sura is a recitation of early Iron Age 'Laws', something one would expect from a backwards Bedouin society of pilfering nomads. Most of the statutes are banal, obtuse and emanate from an uncultured impoverished manner of living. Consider the following 'law', passed on by the 'great' Muhammad on behalf of the moon deity Hub'Al:

004:022* URL
And marry not women whom your fathers married, except what has already passed; indeed it was shameful and most hateful, and an evil way.

Don't marry a woman your father married. How enlightening. How about this prohibition against first-family incest or sex with your 'suckling sisters' ?

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Articles: Can Islam reform?

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
#myjihad: Jihadi leader to Christians: Convert to Islam or die
"Christians must choose "Islam or death," while their women and daughters may legitimately be regarded as wives of Muslims" The enemedia's criminal silence on the relentless and bloody march of Islamic surpremacists on the backs and the bodies...

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
Just following the Koranic fascism of the cult of mad Moh....

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
'Generation Identity' Wages War on France Islamization--Failed Multiculturaism&Welfare Spending Could Lead to Civil War
CBN News has been the leader in reporting on the steady Islamization of France. Now there is another sign that France is breaking down: the rise of 'Generation Indentity.'

PARIS - It was a political protest with shock value, the likes of which has never been seen on French TV news: a group of young people stormed a mosque in the city of Portiers, going to the roof and unfurling a banner calling for a national referendum on Muslim immigration.

The banner included the number 732, the year Charles Martel defeated the Islamic invasion in Portiers.

The group calls itself Generation Identitaire, or Generation Identity. They say they are at war with "the 68'ers," the baby boomers who run France, for wrecking their future with multicultural policies that some fear are turning France into a Muslim nation.

They released a video called "A Declaration of War."

In the video, members say, "We are Generation Identitaire. We are the generation of ethnic fracture, the total failure of coexistence, and the forced mixing of races. We have stopped believing in a 'Global Village' and the 'Family of Man.'"

Their rhetoric sounds racist, but they say they do not believe in racial superiority or racial stereotypes. Rather, they fear losing France to Muslim immigrants from Africa.

CBN News interviewed a leader of the group, Julien Langella, in the southern French city of Toulon.

"It's not about hate of other people," Langella insisted. "It's about heritage. It's about loving our people and our land. And we fight for this."

Groups like Generation Identitaire are symptoms of a nation that is coming unglued. They are an unintended but a predictable by-product of a failed multiculturalism that, instead of creating a melting pot, has created ethnic tribalism and dangerous "no-go zones."

"Assimilation is now impossible in France," Langella said. "It was possible when immigrants came from European countries because they are like us ethnically; they are like us culturally."

The French Republic, which is supposed to be strictly secular, has actively helped Muslims build mosques and spread Sharia law. Polls show most French are alarmed about it.

Renaud Camus, one of France's leading writers, said flatly that France is being colonized by Muslim immigrants with the help of the government and the media. He calls it "The Great Replacement."

"The Great Replacement is very simple," he explained. "You have one people, and in the space of a generation, you have a different people."

"Practically every day Catholic Churches are attacked, and people (are stoned) in a very old Muslim tradition. And if they can't deny that this has happened, they say that this is the result of racism," he said.

Generation Identitaire is also upset that their future has been looted by the baby boomers' out-of-control welfare spending.

In their video, they say, "We are the generation doubly punished: condemned to pay into a social system so generous with strangers it becomes unsustainable for our own people. Our generation is the victims of the May '68'ers, who wanted to liberate themselves from tradition, from knowledge and authority in education."

Aurélie Lamacq, a member of Generation Identitaire, said she is angry with the baby boomers for leaving a mess for her generation "because they had everything."

"They had the cool job. It was easy at the time to buy a flat or house. Their children were secure, and they have taken everything from us," Lamacq charged.

She added that she too no longer believes in cultural assimilation between Christians and Arab immigrants.

"We can't live together because we are not the same ethnically," she said. "We don't have the same religion. We don't have the same way of life, the same values. We have nothing in common. Nothing."

Some believe France is on a trajectory toward more social conflict over immigration and perhaps, someday, civil war.

"The political elite has to understand that it's a fight to the death because it's a matter of survival," Langella said.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Challenging the Cults: Answering Muslims (Islam)
Answering the cult from a Christian perspective: What to say to Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormans, The New Age and others.

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
The first declaration in becoming a Muslim is to acknowledge there is no God but Allah and that Mohammad is His prophet. From the beginning in Islam, the name of Islam’s God, Allah is next to Islam’s prophet. Mohammad as the prophet of Islam received a revelation he claimed by the God of Abraham through the angel Gabriel, this revelation Muslims believe is contained in the pages of the Quran. Muslims believe in Heaven there is an identical book to the Quran, which is written in Arabic. The Quran, delivered in intervals by the angel Gabriel to Mohammad over a period of 22 years. (A.D. 610-632).

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
190 Muhammads Characteristics Part 190
Idiots Guide to Islam http://alrassoolilive.blogspot.com/

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Christianophobia – Islam's hatred of Christians, Sura 3 [2nd part thereof]
Christianophobia – Islam

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
Within the first 100 verses of Sura 3, there were only 47 Christianophobic statements. This is deemed 'moderate' liturgy by the really clever people. In the second half of Sura 3, there are only 30 verses identifying Christians as inferiors, destined for Hell, ripe to be violated and attacked. Big brains and Moslems will declare that this proves the tolerance of the cult of Muhammad. In reality the Koran and by extension Arab and Moslem culture is decidedly supremacist and Christianophobic. The book Recital demands that Moslems kill, subjugate or humiliate the followers of Christ. Both Jesus and Christians are ridiculed in the Koran with Christ mocked as a mere prophet of Allah; a man who did not perform miracles, and was unworthy to be equated with Muhammad the political-military adventurer.

In the second half of Sura 3, or the Family of 'Imran, the following Christianophobic themes are presented:

1) Christians are inferior to Moslems -- so ignore them.

2) Christians are going to Hell and can be killed.

3) The Moslem cult must never be divided.

The Koranic cult is supremacist and racist. Christianity is inferior. It must be either destroyed or the church and its followers in-toto, must be brought under Islamic control and guidance. Those are the only 2 options.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Christianophobia – Islam's hatred of Christians, Sura 3 [first part thereof]
Christianophobia – Islam

Ibn Sufi al Kitab's insight:
Number of verses in Sura 3: 200
Number of verses in the first part of Sura 3: 100
Number of verses of Christianophia in the first part of Sura 3: 47
% of Christianophobic verses in the first part of Sura 3 of the total: 47 %

According to Marxists, Secularists, cult worshippers of the state, the warm [weather fascists], the homosexual, the feminists, and sundry other worthies, Islam and perforce all Moslems, are pro-Christian 'extremists', spending most of their day eagerly kissing, embracing and loving their 'brothers' and co-equal 'people of the book'. Back in the real world, historically for 1400 years, Christians have been enslaved, slaughtered, raped, and confined to second-class dhimmitude status within the Moslem world. Does the Koran promote this hatred of Christians ? Is there Koranic Christianophobia ? Curious minds would like to know.

In Sura 3, or the Family of 'Imran, the following Christianophobic themes are presented:

1) Christians are going to Hell for disbelieving in Islam and Muhammad.

2) Christians must be humiliated and killed.

3) Christians must deny the Trinity and their own beliefs.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Pakistani Christian Girl Raped and Tortured for Eleven Days « Persecution News

Raping and torturing young girls.....isn't that what all intolerant cults do ?

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
The Evil Teachings of Islam
It's time to wake up. The real muslims are the terrorist who are following the teachings within the quran. We are not the one's who say they are killing in t...

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Egypt and the Death of the ‘Arab Spring’

Nearly two years after the “Arab Spring” began in Egypt, the nation’s Muslim Brotherhood president has arrogated to himself dictatorial powers, and is ramming through a new constitution that will effectively extinguish the last vestiges of Egyptian democracy and establish Egypt as a Sharia state. Just as I said back in January 2011, when the uprisings against Mubarak began, for the people in Egypt who had real power to affect change, the “Arab Spring” was never about democracy and pluralism, despite the ululations of the Western press; it was always about imposing Islamic law upon Egypt. And now, with the new constitution, here we are.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Guess how many Islamic terror attacks since 9/11

These are not the regular beatings and vandalism against Christians, Hindus and Buddhists but religion-oriented attacks in which someone dies at the hand of a member of the”religion of peace.”

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
It’s Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month!

Have you done your shopping yet? It’s Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month — what better time to buy a bomb vest for the mujahid you love?

Inspired by a remark from Pat Condell in this video, I have proclaimed December to be Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month. After all, November was Islamophobia Awareness Month, and certainly the hatred and violence in the Qur’an kills many, many more people than “Islamophobia” ever has or ever will, and so it is far more deserving than “Islamophobia” of a month of its own.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Christianophobia – Islam's hatred of Christians, Sura 2 [2nd part thereof]
Sura 2 or the Heifer is one of the last 'revelatory' chapters given by the archangel Gabriel to Muhammad, on behalf of the former family deity and moon idol Hub'Al, recast by Muhammad as the monotheistic Al-Lah or 'The One'. Fully half of this Sura is Christianophobic and Judeo-ophobic. Quite an amount from a cult dedicated, as the one-world wonders inform us, to love and tolerance.

Jihad (holy fighting in Allah's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know.

* *
And fight in the Way of Allah and know that Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

How many Moslems actually dislike Jihad ? Many, most, the majority ? seem to support it. The most important duty a pious Moslem has is Jihad:

They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of the Islamic calendar). Say, "Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allah is to prevent mankind from following the Way of Allah, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Islamic Crusades 6: India’s Millennial Burden
This video gives you a general overview from approximately the 8th century to the 18th century. In Episode 7 I will cover the period following the Mughal Era to the present day, including the post-...

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Christianophobia – Islam's hatred Christians: Sura 2 [first part thereof]
Sura 2 or the Heifer is one of the last 'revelatory' chapters given by the archangel Gabriel, he of Gospel fame, to Muhammad, on behalf of the former family deity and moon idol Hub'Al, recast by Muhammad as the monotheistic Al-Lah or 'The One'. Being one of the last 'communications' with the divine, Sura 2 is of great importance in the Koran and within Moslem liturgy. Over half of this Sura is Christianophic with at least 15 % of this chapter, or some 44 verses [bare minimum], being openly violent and preaching the physical destruction of the Christians. Combined these examples of Christianophobia appear to be a surprisingly large and intolerant amount from a cult dedicated to peace and brotherly love:

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Grim milestone approaching: 20,000 jihad terror attacks worldwide since 9/11 - Jihad Watch

Jubilee, how many slaughtered by the cult of Muhammad in the last 11 years ?

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Pew: USA Muslim population “to double” in 20 years (but has already tripled in almost 3 years)

If immigration patterns and Muslims’ comparatively higher birth rates continue, Pew projects:

• U.S. Muslims will go from a tiny minority now, less than 1% of the nation, to 1.7%. That’s a jump from 2.6 million people in 2010 to 6.2 million.

• Muslim immigration to the USA and Muslims’ share of all new legal permanent residents will continue to rise. Most of the immigrants will arrive from South Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
VIDEO COURSE: Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ in America
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/SbvjtamvnM4?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Islamic Crusades 3: The Co-Option of Jerusalem

Jerusalem has been called the most controversial piece of real estate on earth. Jerusalem is widely recognized as a city holy to three world religions. The media consistently refers to it as the holiest site in Judaism, and the third holiest site in Islam. It is also home to important Christian sites like the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the Via Dolorosa and the Mount of Olives, but it has never been essential to Christian theology that Jerusalem be ruled by a Christian power. The primary justification for the Crusades was to reopen the holy sites to Christian pilgrims who had been barred by the Muslim occupation of the city, not to permanently conquer land. Furthermore, in the 21st century Christians make up less than 2% of the Holy Land’s population, a number that is steadily decreasing as they are driven out by their increasingly radical Muslim neighbors. Thus, today the principle competing claims to the city come from Judaism and Islam. Let’s examine these claims:

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Mohammed the great plagiazer and liar.
Muslims can paint a false portrait of their founder all they want. Their Koran – a pagan fascist document which outstrips Mein Kampf in gibberish and ranting racism – the Hadiths or explanations to the unreadable Koran; and the biography of the founder or Sira; tell us about the real Mohammed. Muslims are only lying to themselves when they try to represent Mohammed as a 'prophet' of peace, love, merriment and inter-cultural extasy. Their own documents and histories tell us otherwise. Mohammed was in effect a murderous brigand; probably quite insane and a man with lusts for blood, power, sex and murder which would challenge even the most intolerant of Mongol, Turkish, or Central Asian nomad in quantity and ferocity. Mohammed was in essence the anti-Christ.

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
Western Civilisation :: Hate in Gaza: It is the Koran stupid.
Why do Moslems in Gaza hate the Jews so much ? Why did the Islamic imperialist conquest of Judea and Israel in 638 AD mandate dhimmitude or second-class knave status for all Jews and Christians ? Why have the Arabs launched 6 wars against the Jews in Israel since 1947 ? Why do Imams, the hierarchy of Islamic theocratic governance and Moslem jurists and poli-ocratic preachers demand a second holocaust ? Further why do Western morons, dimwits, and racists side with the Arab Moslems on this issue ?

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam
The world's most popular Muslim preacher, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, asks Allah to destroy the Jews - Jihad Watch

Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi is the most popular Islamic preacher in the world. And he has done this before. He said on al-Jazeera: “Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers….”

See it on Scoop.it, via The cult of Islam