Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
The greatest accretion of wealth in human history, occurred between 900-1300 in medieval Europe. This was the time of 'Feudalism', a much pilloried concept as investigated by the usual cadre of revisionist historians. If Feudalism was so terrible, why did Europe undergo an agricultural, than a capitalist revolution in this period ? Nothing like it in history had been witnessed. If the system was so arcane and unfair, how did the Europeans with their Feudal model, manage to avoid total extermination against the pagan moon worshiping Moslems from the south, the Avars and Magyars [or Huns which is what they really were] from the east; and the Vikings from the north [who linked up the Moslems in the white slave trade] ?
In the Baroque era the remnants of Feudalism as practiced by the Spanish in Sicily for example [amongst other locales], had indeed turned negative. Large baronial estates, a vast rich versus poor divide, a caste system of impermeable hierarchy dominated some parts of the late Feudal era. Sicily for example never recovered with the bandito or later day Cosa Nostra [our thing], originally being outlaws fighting against the Feudal iniquity. The same occurred in many places in Europe and even in North America during the early modern period. By then, technology, communications, and circumstances had all changed.
However, from the period 900-1300, Feudalism must have been quite different. We know this from the wealth, the terms of trade and indeed, the very survival of Christian Europe, which a betting man in 900, would likely have wagered against. In an era of Moslem and Viking pillaging, Jihad, slave trading, raiding and destruction, a Feudal compact would have been the only way a society might have survived. There was no alternative. Liege lords provided a professional militia, protection, certainty, and the formation of social institutions and norms. In exchange serfs, which ranged from the free to the unfree, would give about 1/3 of their production to the Liege as payment, as well as time to serve in the local militia including training, drilling and fighting as needed. It was a practical solution and no other viable option existed, in an age in which communications and technology simply did not lend themselves to centralized states with force project and defensive capability, stretching over large territories. When the Vikings or Moslems arrived, lustful for women, slaves, and plunder, there was no time for a centralized state to react. It was a local and at best, a regional response which was needed.
Some of the benefits of the Feudal system included:
-Local protection from regional, or external enemies, brigands, violence.
-Establishment of a defined organization to react to, and deal with, conflicts, attacks, and raids.
-Through guilds and family 'skills', a certainty regarding work, vocation and purpose.
-Social cohesion and frameworks of dealing with problems.
-A reduction through Church canon law, of usurious rates of interest. This was mandatory in an agricultural society, in which farmers would never have the surplus profits necessary to repay exorbitant loans.
-An expectation of some level of ethics, morality and proper public decorum and presentation.
-Defined hierarchy of order, institutions, laws, and social support. The beginnings of 'labor rights', the welfare state, social obligations and economic division of skills and productivity; are clearly in evidence between 900-1300.
The above benefits should not blind us to the problems with Feudalism. All too often the Lords and Barons were despots as divorced from Christian idealism as any modern power-hungry politician. But that is the human condition. In the main the inevitable development of strata and privilege of the Feudal system, should not obscure its importance in allowing Christendom to survive. Without that end result there is no modern world.
Muhammad is the anti-thesis of Jesus Christ, or in more prosaic terms the anti-Christ. Indeed Muhammad's family idol Baal, the Meccan moon deity, is depicted as a depraved cult of evil in the Old Testament. Mein Koran and Mein Muhammad basically teach the opposite of Christianity. Of that there is no doubt. If you have read Mein Koran, the history of Moslem Jihad, and the core texts of the Hadith and Sira, you know that Islam is in the main, anti-Christian, and offers the view of an anti-Christ, namely Muhammad.
One clear example out of a million one could mention in differentiating the fascistic death cult of Muhammad, which runs riot with anti-semiticism, misogyny, Christian-hate, violence, illiteracy, and Jihad; is that Muhammad did not, could not and would not, perform miracles. The list of miraculous episodes attributed to Christ are only hinted at in the New Testament. A full list is never given. As John stated, it would take too many scribes and too many books. Nevertheless there are about 2 dozen such miracles identified in the Bible, including raising 4 people from the dead, though no doubt many more were raised. The resurrection is the greatest miracle in history, attested to by Romans, Jews and modern Christian haters. No coherent set of facts or arguments exist to contravene the act of the risen Christ.
What of Muhammand and his miracles ?
First, Moslems tried to ascribe to Muhammad the known and accepted miracles of Christ. As usual Mein Islam poaching and plagiarizing from Jewish or Christian sources. Islamic expert Guillaume writes:
“Whether the object of the inventors was to elevate their prophet to a position equal to that held by Jesus in the estimation of His servants, or whether it was to furnish themselves and their pupils with a messenger of God who satisfied a natural craving of the human heart for a visible manifestation of divine power it is not our purpose to determine....the works of Christ...and those of his apostles are freely drawn on and put into the mouth of Muhammad.”
Thus we have yet again Moslem deceit and fiction. Muhammad was a lustful, violent, brigand, who had no power to perform the miraculous because he did not possess any real faith. His cult of submission was simply a tool of control. Mein Koran contains no ethics whatsoever that are Catholic or Universal. Be nice to fellow Moslems. Kill or conquer the rest.
Dashti, the Iranian Moslem investigator comments:
“Moslems, as well as others, have disregarded the historical facts. They have continually striven to turn this man [Muhammad] into an imaginary superhuman being, a sort of God in human clothes, and have generally ignored the ample evidence of his humanity. They have been ready....to present these fantasies as miracles.”
There is no record – NONE – in Mein Koran of Muhammad discussing God and love. Nor is there any record – NONE – of Muhammad discussing God, the spirit, the soul and the Golden Rule. It is all violence, hate, bile and the world riven into 2 – Moslems versus the rest.
Mein Koran has many passages in which the Fuehrer Muhammad is asked to perform a miracle. He always remains dumb and mute. He ignores the pleas. He does nothing. No resurrection of the dead, water was not turned into wine, 5.000 were not fed with a few loaves, the elements were not arrested, people were not cured.
Christ brought hope, faith, love, the golden rule and charity. Muhammad arrived touting sex slavery, misogyny, intolerance, anti-semiticism, a hatred of Christians and Jihad. Why would any educated, intelligent human follow Mein Muhammad ?
What 'prophet' of 'God', or in the case of Islam, Baal the Meccan moon deity; does not have a harem? What speaker of morality, ethics and immaterial spirituality does not cover himself in the flesh of many women, as well as in gold and silver ? Mein Koran makes it very clear that women are the property of men [see here]. Sura 2, the longest chapter is full of misogyny and the demand that men control women.
The reason is Muhammad's own life and his own debauched existence. He acted as if female ownership by men, truly was a revelatory 'fact' given to him by Baal. It was simply part of Arab-Meccan culture of course, enshrined as 'divine' by a lustful, sex-addled luxuriant posing as a man of religiosity. Sadly, since Moslems must believe that Muhammad is mankind's ultimate example, it only stands to reason that viewing females as flesh toys for men, inferior, subservient and of no real value will permeate the Moslem cult.
This is why more than half of Moslem women are illiterate, 10.000 daughters are slaughtered each year, wife-beating is common, and women in Moslem countries have limited rights to private assets, transport, or any action independent of men [a trenchant critique is summarize in now-atheist Hirsi Ali's book, Nomad]. Hence the bed sheets pious Moslem females must wear, in order to denote their chattel status, now wafting and on parade throughout the Western world – a sure sign of imperialism if there was one.
Ali Dashti, a noted Moslem 'scholar', [or science fiction writer, which in regards to Islam, would be the same thing]; lists what are in his view, Muhammad's wives, as backed up by Mein Koran, Mein Hadith and Mein Sira. Other investigations have identified 2-3 more wives, or sex-slaves, but in any event 22 is quite enough to drive home the main point that women are merely tools to be used by Moslem men for various purposes:
Aesha [had sex with Muhammad at the age of 9, was betrothed to him at age 6]
Zaynab of Jahsh
Safiya [a Jewish princess, taken and raped by Muhammad on the same day the Moslems attacked her village and killed her husband, father and brothers, noted for her great beauty].
Asma of Saba
Zaynab of Khozayma
Asma of Noman
Mary the Christian [purportedly Muhammad's favorite concubine, which caused political problems of jealously within the harem as reported in Mein Koran]
Maymuna not of Hareth
Numbers 17 and 18 were according to Dashti, concubines. The last 4 were women who for some reason just joined the harem out of their great love for the Arab Fuehrer. The first 16 are considered to be officially the wives of Muhammad, and many of these women are mentioned in Moslem sources, including passing through a marriage ceremony.
If your leader and prophet had 16 wives, 2 sex slaves, and 4 other concubines, was deemed 'holy' and grand; and was the torch bearer of the 'true religion'; what then might your attitude to women be ? One reason why Islam is a gigantic failure is its attitude and even hatred of the female. Obey Mein Koran. Serve the man. Ask for his approval on everything. Allow him as many wives or sex-slaves as he likes.
Curiously Muhammad in Mein Koran only allows the average Moslem male 4 wives or sex slaves. Of course he could have whatever number he desired. It is rather curious that fascisms always speak in such a manner. Restrictions for the acolytes and cult members. Illimitable freedoms and prerogative for the leadership.
Atheist-Marxist-Revisionist historians always portray Frederick the II from the 13th century, and Emperor of Germany, parts of Italy and Sicily as a supreme example of the multi-cultural, clever, tolerant, magnanimous and chivalrous leader. The corruption of 'history' and the adding of positive myths for political and philosophical reasons to a personage, can find no greater example than in the form of the execrable Frederick II, an atheist, a secularist, and a mass murdering psychopath.
Frederick II was born in 1194 and died in 1250 [unfortunately a long, active life]. Proclaimed Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick was indeed unholy, too twisted and deformed to be an Emperor and certainly not a Roman. Frederick II controlled the richest kingdoms in the West including Germany, parts of northern Italy, and the all important granary and strategic island of Sicily, recently won back from Moslem rule, by Normans in the 11th century. As with most egos, F II never built, created, endeavored or labored. He was born, therefore he must rule. State power was his theology, with himself as God. No wonder 'historians' love him so much. Reflected in his sword which he used only on Christians and never on Moslems, they see their own image of the perfect man, the supreme ruler, the idol uber alles, the [not so] benevolent despot they would love to be; a lover of the moon cult as well.
You will find few if any real appraisals of a man, on google, or in any history book. A man more akin to the absolute despotism of the Sun King, Hitler or that of a Stalin, rather than a pious Christian prince interested in science, math, and the welfare of his people. His career is one of deceit, boundless ambition, endless war on the Papacy and other Christians in Italy and beyond, and the desire, stated in his own words to make the Church, the Pope and every other human, subservient to himself.
Despotic, unenlightened, demonic. No wonder 'historians' are so in love with the man. For example after making a non-crusade , which he had delayed for 15 years; Frederick made a ridiculously inane truce with weakened Moslem forces in Israel, that he could have eradicated if he had the intelligence and honesty to do so. The pact with the Moslems stated that the Christians in 1228 for ten years would own Jerusalem, but could build nothing. After 10 years they would hand it back to the Moslems. Cynical and ever so typical of the Atheist-self obsessed personality. A deal that made no sense whatsoever. Upon returning to Sicily in late 1228 – basically chased out of the Holy Land by Christians – he began a brutal, uncompromising set of wars against the Church, Christians and free men not enslaved by his totalitarian government. He could not war against the Moslems, but had no compunction in doing so in the most barbaric manner imaginable, against fellow Christians.
Warren Carroll in The Glory of Christendom, volume 3, is one of the few to see the man for who he really was – an out-of-control Atheist [there is not doubt about this, he certainly was neither agnostic, nor religious, he was God or so he claimed]; power monger, who started endless wars in Italy and central Europe solely for personal ambition and power. Slaughtering thousands, mutilating prisoners, breaking agreements, trying as hard as imaginable to make the Papacy, the Church and every free man or women subservient to him and him alone. He attacked Rome only to be turned aside by an 'old man with a staff', the venerable Pope Gregory IX. Frederick as usurper of all authority is clearly stated in his 1231 publication claiming he is God.
“In 1231 Frederick issued the Constitution of Melfi [Liber Augustalis], a codification of the old Norman laws of the Kingdom of Sicily combined with a large body of new laws decreed by Frederick. It was the first codification of law for a nation to have been done since the reign of the Roman Emperor Justinian, and it reflected a concept of absolute monarchy derived from pre-Christian Rome.” [p. 223]
In Ancient Rome and Byzantium, it was the Emperor uber alles. No other authority temporal, secular or religious could be allowed, unless it was completely subservient to the King.
Endless wars ensued after this proclamation. In 1231 Pope Gregory IX knew all too well, what the atheist Frederick wanted – complete and utter subservience of Church and man to himself. Frederick II referred to himself as the Messiah, the appointed God on Earth; a man with more claim to total power than any Pope sitting in the chair of the fisherman from Galilee. From this belief system his career became a long list of abuses: endless wars, destruction of churches and church property, and eradicating freedom for all men and women. Totalitarian control was his objective, freedom and centers of opposition the enemy. The only counter-weight to this secular fascism, was as always, the Papacy and the Church.
“Pope Gregory IX well knew what all of this meant. He warned Frederick against 'promulgating new laws' which would make him a persecutor of the Church and a destroyer of freedom of the Christian people...The Pope also objected strongly to Frederick's taxation and control of the Church in the Kingdom of Sicily, and to his maintenance of thousands of Moslems at public expense in the region of Lucera in southern Italy, from whom his personal bodyguard was drawn.” [p. 225]
When Frederick waged war on his own people from 1235 to his death, he used 10.000 Moslem soldiers in northern Italy, paid for by the sacking and plundering of Church lands and assets. No wonder the modern multi-culti orgasm and faint at the mention of his name.
As Frederick ripped apart Christian Europe in a civil war and in his lust for totalitarian control; the Mongols, who would later convert to the moon cult of Mecca, irrupted into Europe. By 1243 the Mongols controlled Russia, the Ukraine, most of Hungary, Austria and parts of northern Italy. There could be no coordinated response to this most vile of threats, whilst Frederick gleefully, sadistically, and pathetically impaled Christian Europe on the sword of his own ego.
“Frederick II had far more in common with Napoleon or even with Hitler than with any of his leading contemporaries. Both Napoleon and Hitler were also apostate Catholics [both were Atheists of course]. Both of them and their regimes were condemned by the Church.....” [p.245]
The tomb of this monster was opened in 1782. Frederick had died wearing Moslem clothes, with Arabic inscriptions. A very small cross was found on his left shoulder. Was he a Moslem? Unlikely since he mocked the Meccan cult as much as he did the faith of Christianity. He hated the Jew, but he hated all who were religious, or not devoted to his personal cause. Frederick II was a modern totalitarian psychopath, atheist, self-absorbed, drenched in blood and violence, dishonest, imprudent and materialist. This is why 'historians' are so favorable. He reminds them of the modern world.
Sura 21 or 'The Prophets', claims that all Jewish and Christian Prophets were Moslem. This fantastically illiterate claim would only impress Atheists, Marxists and Moslems. Al-Lah is Baal, the moon deity of Mecca. It means 'The Lord', not God. Baal is the enemy of Judaism and Christianity. Read the Old Testament. In effect Mein Koran stipulates that the pagan death cult of Baal, was supported by spiritual holy men, dedicated to fighting against it. Next the big brains will claim that National Socialism and Atheism are all about freedom, free-will and tolerance.
20% of this Sura is preoccupied with why and how the Infidel will be destroyed. The rest is a long historical revision of why Jewish and Christians prophets are really Moslem. The two themes mixed together concoct a madness that is the opposite of a religious liturgy.
Polytheists are Christians who worship the Trinity [verse 29]. They cry in humiliation in verse 14, because they have denied the prophecy of Muhammad [verse 3] and the oneness of Baal. For these crimes they shall be tortured for infinity.
Believe or perish. So spaketh Mein Koran. No need for rational investigation, reason, or true faith. Obey, follow, shut up.
More madness from 'The Prophets' is here.
Phd Morey's common sense study of the cult named Submission, most likely would not find its way into print today. Suppressing facts, evidence, testimony and reality is now deemed 'free speech'. Morey would most likely end up in court or jail in many jurisdictions for 'hate speech' which considering Mein Koran is one long screed of hate, and the Meccan cult is a mixture of racist, supremacist and misognynist ravings; is rather obtuse. But there you have it – the decline of Western culture into the psychopathologically sick morass of cultural Marxism. The protection of a Bronze age inspired cult whose Mein Koran 'law' reads like the inane tortures commanded by Hammurabi's 1750 BC codex, is lauded and applauded as the highest form of tolerance.
Morey on the moon cult:
“In Arabia, the sun god was viewed as a female goddess and the moon as the male god. As has been pointed out by many scholars such as Alfred Guillaume, the moon god was called by various names, one of which was Allah. The name Allah was used as the personal name of the moon good versus other titles that could be given to him.” [p. 48] [In fact Mein Koran lists 99 names for the moon god].
“Allah, the moon god, was married to the sun goddess. Together they produced three goddesses who were called the 'daughters of Allah'. These three goddesses were called Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat.” [p. 49] [In fact Al-Lat is often used to refer to the Sun goddess, so many believe that Uzza and Manat or Venus and Mars, were the only 2 daughters].
The Arabs were astro-worshippers as were most Near Eastern peoples. The moon had an especially important role to play in cooling temperatures, heralding seasonal change, and providing a permanent source of calender creation and organization. Baal, the Babylonian Sin, or moon deity, was the Al Lah or Lord of Mecca.
“The Quraysh tribe into which Muhammad was born was particularly devoted to Allah, the moon god and especially to Allah's three daughters who were viewed as intercessors between them and Allah. The worship of the three goddesses, Al-Lat, Al-Uzaa and Manat played a significant role in the worship at the Kabah in Mecca.” [p. 49]
When Muhammad conquered Mecca with his 10.000 man personal army, his first act was to destroy all of the 360 idols of the Kabah shrine bar one – that of Baal the Lord of Mecca, resplendent in red sandstone. The rest, including Baal's daughters, were effaced. A practice that Moslems still employ today- destroying all non Koranic images and structures.
What is Morey's main point ? The cult of Submission or Islam, is a pagan Arabian construct, completely divorced and different than Judaism and Christianity.
“The Quran's concept of deity evolved out of a pre-Islamic pagan religion. It is so uniquely Arabian that it cannot be simply reduced to Jewish or Christian beliefs. It is rooted in pagan ideas of God.” [p.51]
Morey's statement is so obvious that it should be common knowledge. However, the media, the education systems, the 'experts', the politicians and the general cadre of corrupts and incompetents, preach the opposite. Mein Koran and the veneration of Mein Fuehrer Muhammad are constructs built around moon worship. How Bronze Age. How pagan. For more info on why Islam is a moon cult, a reading list of articles is here.
Phd [appeal to authority!] Morey studied the Moslem [un] holy texts back in the 1970s and 80s, long before the 97% scientific consensus that Islam is peace, existed; and concluded that Islam was and is a pagan cult devoid of religiosity. He produced books and articles on the same theme. Today of course he would not be granted a Phd for such thought crimes. In the UK and elsewhere he would be jailed for hate speech.
Anyone who has studied pre-Muhammadan and Islamic history, would not be shocked by what Morley had to say some 20 years ago. It is a sign of the illiterate times that his work is not better known, and his given facts, not widely distributed. Consider:
-Mein Koran was cobbled together by Muhammad [eg the short Suras or poems], from pre-existing material. [p. 34] “In the end the Muslim must give up his belief in the heavenly origin of the Quran. If this is done, Islam cannot stand.” [p. 43]
-The word Islam, pre-dates Muhammad by millennia, and was originally employed to denote bravery and courage in the face of impossible odds. 'The word slowly developed into the meaning of 'submission' as Dr. Jane Smith at Harvard University has demonstrated.' [p. 35].
-Killing non Moslems comes right out of the Arabian tribal mentality: “It should be emphasized that the Arabs did not regard killing a person as in itself wrong. It was wrong if the person was a member of your kin-group or an allied group; and in Islam this meant the killing of any believer [4:92].” [p. 36]
-Moon worship and the Sabeans. Al Lah means the Lord, who was of course Baal the male moon god first imported from Babylonia. Cosmological worship was rife in the Arabian peninsula and directly informs the cult of submission. “...the dominant religion that had grown very powerful just before Muhammad's time was that of The Sabean's. The Sabeans had an astral religion in that they worshipped the heavenly bodies. The moon was viewed as a male deity and the sun the female deity. Together they produced other deities such as the starts. The Quran refers to this in Sura 41:37 and elsewhere. They used a lunar calendar...the phases of the moon.” [p.40] The Islamic world still uses a lunar calendar today.
-Allah is a moon god whose identity is never clarified in Mein Koran. It did not need a definition. All Arabs knew who Baal or the Lord was: “Dr. Arthur Jeffery, who was one of the foremost Western Islamic scholars in modern times....'The name Allah, as the Quran itself is witness, was well known in pre-Islamic Arabia. Indeed, both it and its feminine form, Allat, are found not infrequently among theophorous names in inscriptions from North Africa.' [p. 45]
-The name Al Lah “According to the Encyclopedia of Religion; 'Allah' is a pre-Islamic name....corresponding to the Babylonian Bel.' [p. 46] Bel or Sin was the moon deity of Babylon [Mout Sinai, is thus the Mountain of the Moon deity].
-The pagan heathen nature of Islam is easily seen in its rites, rituals, pilgrimmage, kissing of rocks, throwing rocks at devils, circa-ambulation of the Kabaa, rubbing of rocks against the vagina for fertility, and other artifacts of the Bronze age customs one could find in Mecca in 600 AD. “Alfred Guillaume, who was Head of the Department of the Near and Middle East...at the University of London...'The customs of heathenism have left an indelible mark on Islam, notably in the rites of pilgrimage.' [p. 41]
-Why is the Bible so messed up and garbled in Mein Koran ? “Some of the heretical teachings of the Gnostics were present in pre-Islamic Arabia in such fraudulent 'Gospels' as the 'The Gospel of Barnabas'. These Gnostic 'gospels' began to appear in the latter part of the 3rd century and reached their highest influence during the 4th to 7th centuries. Their presence in pre-Islamic Arabia is well known.” [p. 42]
The cult of submission is suffused with pagan rites, it worships a moon deity, it has an incoherent and inaccurate opinion about the Old and New Testaments, and it targets Jews and Christians [and those outside the Muslim tribe or Umma] for destruction. The huge brains of the world deem the above to be religious. And we have not even mentioned the duty of Jihad, misogyny, sex trading, polygamy, bronze age death sentences.....
Mein Koran and Muhammad's cult is in large part, a sex cult. It is also of course a fascist-pagan cult of death and violence [see the Moslem world any day of the week for more info]. But sex slavery, the lure of women, concubinage, along with gold and plunder, were the animating forces of Muhammad's cult in its early days. Indeed sheep have more value than women in Mein Koran. ISIS and other barbarians are simply trying to recreate that 'utopia' for Moslem men. Consider a recent spate of rapes of Infidel women by ISIS [many thousands have been sold into sex slavery]:
Reported the Times’ Rukmini Callimachi: [PJ Media]
In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.
“He told me,” the girl recounted, “that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God.”
Baal is not God. It is the moon deity of Mecca and in the Old Testament it is associated with evil, and cults of criminality, including the Canaanites who in the name of Baal, performed child sacrifices, condoned sex slavery and all forms of sexual deviancy. [hey, sounds like the modern world!]
But remember, the 97% consensus expert opinion is that ISIS is not Islam, and Islam is not savage, barbaric, or interested in sex slavery, concubinage, or raping Infidel women. When ISIS quotes that raping women is sanctioned by the Al Lah thing, it is a mis-quote and mis-translation. That is all. The fact that Muhammad had sex with a 9 year old, and had between 15-24 wives or concubines must be ignored, as must be the rape and sex slavery of millions of non Moslem women in 1400 years. After all the experts declaim; who is to say that 7th century Bedouin barbarism is not as 'good' or 'moral' as the culture of today ? After all we do abort 3 million fetuses in the West each year....
Sura 20 is the usual incoherent Koranic chapter, this time claiming that Islam is superior to Judaism and Christianity, because Mein Koran says so. In related news Atheists preen that they are scientists because 97% of them claim that as a fact. In the fetid, irrational world of Mein Muhammad's cult, tautology and illogical attributions are accepted by the huge brains as 'fact' and 'proof' that Islam is not only a religion, but the 'last one' and therefore 'superior'. The Western multi-culti states this ignorance as fact, though 97% of its adherents have not read Mein Koran.
Sura 20 offers no ethical program, but plenty of supremacism. It has 3 themes:
All Jewish and Christian prophets were Moslem,
Satan corrupted mankind and especially the Jews and Christians leading them 'astray' and forming an alliance with them against Moslems [20:114-130] and
The Koran and following Muhammad is 'proof' of Allah [21:113] and that all Moslems who unquestioningly follow the commands of this book will be 'saved'.
This indeed sums up the Koran. Why do Moslems hate Jews and Christians so much ? First they are linked to Satan. Second this Satanic alliance arose out of their rejection first of Mad Muhammad, and then of his handbook of hate Mein Koran. Third, Muhammad said he is a prophet of the Lord of Mecca, or Baal, and Baal confirmed his prophethood. Therefore it is true. This third fact supports the first two 'scientific proofs' against the hated Jew and Christian. See how logical it all is ?
Jews, Christians who are polytheists and other 'deniers' will be tormented and destroyed:
Muhammad is supreme. His book of hate a demand, not an option, to follow. He said so. The Al Lah Baal said so. Baal only loves Muhammad. Muhammad is Baal's only spokesman. He said so. Therefore it must be true. Obey mad Muhammad or be annihilated:
Baal said Muhammad is the only messenger of his new and improved handbook. Belief in Jesus and the Catholic Trinity are a blasphemy punished by death. The Jews are beyond help, being in league with the Christians and Satan. This leaves Mein Koran and Submission as the only artifacts of 'God' and his absolutist requirements. Follow Mein Koran. Hate the Jews and Christians. And you might be saved. Or not. It all depends how 'pious' you are.
Mad Muhammad, the suffering epileptic and psychotic who hated Christians and Jews, had such a confused interpretation of the Gospels and Old Testaments, that Mein Koran, which endeavours to plagiarize and then debase the Biblical texts; is full of mistakes when it comes to Jewish and Christian liturgy. According to Mein Koran and Sura 19, named 'Mary'; Mary is not the mother of Jesus, but a sister of Moses. One sees the confusion of dates and eras throughout the Koran, and Moslem apologists who state that Mary is Miriam the sister of Moses are simply lying.
The name of the chapter is Mary, referencing the mother of Jesus. If you read the chapter you will notice the venom directed at Christians. Mary gave birth to Christ. In Mein Koran, the Christ can never be connected to the worship of the divine. So of course 19:28 is discussing Mary the mother of Jesus, since the entire chapter's premise is to discredit Christianity.
For example it was the mighty Allah which saw Mary through her child birthing process, “And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree: she cried (in her anguish) 'Ah! would that I had died before this!....But (a voice) cried to her from beneath the (palm-tree): 'Do not grieve! For your Lord has provided a rivulet beneath you;...” And so the gracious Allah waters and feeds Mary and ensures that Jesus is born and fed. This denies the manger event at Bethlehem and other aspects of the birth of Christ.
The critical point is simply that Allah is responsible for the birth of Christ, he is a slave of Allah not a begotten con-substantial equal with God; and that he is less important than Muhammad.
Because Christians have corrupted the true story of Christ and his nature, and because they worship a Trinity; they are going to hell and need to be destroyed. No one is allowed to associate Christ with the Christian God, conflated in Mein Koran with Baal the Meccan moon deity. It is Muhammad, not Christ, uber alles:
Christians are polytheists who must be destroyed ['are in plain error']. They don't believe in the 'oneness' of Baal:
Passages in this Sura describe annihilating those who do not follow Mein Muhammad. Christians and the Unbelievers for example will be driven as sinners to hell; imitating thirsty cattle taken to water.
There is no ethical regard in this Sura for Christians. None.
Sura 18, or the Cave, reviewed here and here, is a dank, dismal, mess of anti-Christian and anti-Jewish hate speech. Christians are polytheist devils in Mein Koran, allied with Shaitun or Satan. They are to be punished in this life and the next for associating 'false idols' with the Al Lah or Lord of Mecca [Baal]:
For Christians, Hell is prepared as entertainment, since Jesus Christi is a slave of the Al Lah or male moon idol of Mecca. He is not co-equal and not begotten of God the Father. He is simply a chattering prophet of the Baal cult of Mecca. Christians who worship the Trinity are thus damned. No 'partners' can be associated with Muhammad's family's deity, nor any idol or image. How tolerant.
Verse 29, “...We have prepared a Fire whose (smoke and flames), like the walls and roof of a tent, will hem them in: if they implore relief they will be granted water like melted brass, that will scald their faces. How dreadful the drink !”
Verse 31, “For them [Muslims of course] will be Gardens of Eternity;....'
Verse 56, “..but the Unbelievers dispute with vain argument, in order therewith to weaken the truth, and they treat My Signs as a jest, as also the fact that they are warned!”
Verse 59, “Such were the populations We destroyed when they committed iniquities; but We fixed an appointed time for their destruction.”
102, “Verily we shall prepare Hell for the Unbelievers for (their)
Verse 106, “That is their reward, Hell; because they rejected Faith, and took My Signs and My Messengers by way of jest.”
'They' are non Moslems, the Jews and Christians, who rejected Muhammad's demands that they obey him as another prophet. Once rebuffed, Muhammad and his cult identify the Jews and Christians as the enemy to be destroyed. By 632 AD most of the once thriving and sophisticated Jewish and Christian centers in Arabia were depopulated by war, forced exile, or sex slavery.
Sura 18 also contains the famous Moslem scientific claim that the Sun sets in a muddy marsh in the West. Even given the illiteracy and barbarism of 7th century Arabia, this ode to ignorance is still shocking.
The Sun sets in a marsh. This is what the infallible 'scientific Koran' states:
It is not a surprise after reading such a Sura as 'The Cave' to know that Islam has not produced anything over 1400 years. Moslems who believe that the Koran contains all knowledge, apparently support the idea of a muddy marsh being the home of the Sun. An educated five year old knows better. Then again most Moslems are likely more interested in the tasty tidbits of Christian and Jew hate so effulgent and prominent in this chapter.
Sura 17 'The Israelites', makes dim reading, attempting to degrade and debase Jews. Mein Koran does this throughout its fetid text both directly and indirectly. It constantly states that the Jews rejected the true teachings of Baal, who is the Al Lah of Mecca. This is critically illiterate given that Yahweh has nothing to do with Mecca, and the cult of Baal was in actual fact opposed to the God of Israel. Baal is linked in the Old Testament with child sacrifice, deviant sex, violence, blood and poverty.
This Sura starts off with the usual Muslim claim that all Jewish prophets were actually envoys of the great moon deity Allah, “We gave Moses the Book, and made it a Guide to the Children of Israel, (commanding): “Do not take other than Me as the Disposer of (your) affairs.”
We read this on page 176, a repetitive claim issued innumerable times from the start of Muhammad's Mein Koran. The assaulted reader is told that all Jewish prophets and leaders are in fact Muslims, and that 'We' or 'Muslims' gave Moses et al their words, books, powers and insights. The point of the Sura as given in the second verse is clear and quite repetitive – the Jews left the true 'path' of Allah's enlightenment and therefore must be destroyed.
Verse 4 sums up the Muslim antipathy and the Arab-Muslim penchant for dialectical history; “And We gave (clear) warning to the Children of Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!”
Mein Muhammad claimed – after the Jews rejected him as a prophet – that the ancient Israelites had corrupted the pure message of the Meccan Baal. This claim was unlikely to impress any sentient Jew then, or now. It does provide however, the key excuse to kill, dominate, attack, rape and denude the Jews of their persons and assets. Somehow, the Jewish rejection of Baal, makes it okay to kill them.
The usage of this Muslim 'We' – whatever it is – is rather cunning . Who is the 'We'? Muhammad and Allah of course. The one and the same. Muhammad becomes a God, co-equal with Baal. Because Muhammad is the key 'Sheik' or idol to be worshiped, he can dispense with an ethical program. All you need to do is obey the 'We'.
This Sura like every Sura has nothing or very little which could be considered an ethical program, the Golden Rule, or higher metaphysics designed to elevate life, human worth and dignity. Like every other Sura there is a morbid focus on death, conversion, racism and universal will to rule. It is an Arabic Wagenerian epic – one designed to impress the reader with the culpability of all Jews, and the divinely sanctioned approval of all Muslims. Most importantly is the sanctification of Muhammad and everything he said and did.
There are three verses out of 111 which deal with some form of ethics. Verse 31 says, “Do not kill your children....”, the Arabs in the 7th century A.D. were still practitioners of child sacrifice – a practice the Jews had stopped around 2000 B.C. Verse 32 says, “Nor come near to adultery....” - a good rule and one that does the Koran credit especially since ethics is so rarely pronounced. Verse 33 adjures, “Nor take life – which Allah has made sacred – except for just cause.” This is also a good idea, except it references of course only Muslim life. Non-believers are to be killed or converted as each Sura and innumerable verses make clear.
But in general, this being the Koran, there is a long, long list of violence. Fully 29% of the text preaches violent hate against non Moslems.
God is the Al Lah, or the 'We' of Muhammad and Al Lah. Muhammad is the universal Sheik sent by Allah to proclaim submission to the Muhammad-Allah nexus:
Muhammad and Al Lah will grant you grace, mercy and heaven if they see fit. Or maybe not. They might approve or disapprove of you. Only they know. The only hope for you is benign, total, submission to the diktats of Muhammadism.
The Bee, is another incoherent, quite mad rambling in Mein Koran. The illogic is as follows: Al Lah, or Baal the Lord of Mecca created Bees which make honey. This sustenance is used by man, as part of his supply of nourishment. Therefore Moslems who believe in the Baal deity are blessed and shall garner the benefits of honey. Those, such as Jews and Christians, who reject any part of Muhammadism are cursed.
The only 'truth' in Mein Koran, is what Muhammad says it is. Reject any part of Muhammadism and you are going to be tortured and tormented by the Al Lah thing.
Interestingly the Bee is mentioned just once in this Sura [16:68]. The importance and value of honey in the ancient world, which prized this commodity, is thus attributed to the moon deity of Mecca. This is an attempt to depose and negate the Old Testament story of Moses feeding his large flock of hungry, grumbling Israelites with 'manna'. Manna is not bread, in Hebrew it references honey. An insect related to the bee produces honey on cacti and other desert plants. When climactic conditions allow, this honey can be produced in large quantities and will fall to the ground. This honey fed the Israelites.
But according to Mein Koran, the moon deity of Mecca, Baal, about whom Moses would have known nothing and which has no connection whatsoever to Yahweh and Jewish-Christian ideas about God; fed the wandering Hebrews, exiled for 40 years in the deserts around Sinai. The allusion and fable making is absurd. But if a sentient Jew or Christian rejects any part of Sura 16, he is destined for torment and destruction, even if he objects using reason and facts to the supremacist attempt to attribute the salvation of the Jews under Moses, to the intercession of Allah and his honey production:
Christians are likewise targeted for destruction in very clear terms:
No mistranslation here.
The madness of Mein Koran. Bees come from Allah. Manna or honey sustained the Jews. Therefore the Jews and their offshoots the Christians must praise and glorify the name of the Al Lah thing. Within Islam, reason never meets faith or reality. It is all gibberish and jumble-mash. More insanity from the Bee is here.
In the late 6th century the Christian Byzantines, one of the wealthiest empires in history, saved a pretender to the Persian-Parthian throne named Chosroes II. Later, the Byzantine Emperor Maurice, who had aided Chosroes to seize power; was murdered by a drunken psychopath, and poor general, named Phocas. The temptation for the Parthian-Persians was too much. Here was a legitimate call to war – to aid the aggrieved Byzantine population against the tyrant who murdered the just Emperor and a former friend and ally. Of course it would also fill the treasuries of the Persians with booty, plunder, more land, and the subjugation of Byzantine....
Warren H. Carroll in his great book, 'The Building of Christendom', surely an opus on the subject, describes what happens:
“In the spring of 611 he [Chosroes] launched the greatest of all the Persian invasions of Roman territory in the Christian era. It engulfed Endessa, Antioch, and all of Syria, swept into Asia Minor, ran through Cappadocia. A weak counterattack by Heraclius in 613 accomplished little or nothing.....[Parthians] overwhelmed Damascus and Galilee and came rolling up to the hills of Jerusalem about Easter 614.”
When Phocas the drunken tyrant had murdered the legitimate emperor Maurice, he dispatched the entire Byzantine treasure into the watery depths of the Bosporus, knowing and fearing that retribution would be his reward. It was. He was justly murdered. Heraclius, one of the greatest emperors, took over. But he was handcuffed. When the Persians invaded with their largest force in history he was already reduced to a poorly trained militia, a small permanent army, and puerile generals. He would eventually defeat the Parthians, but only by rebuilding his army, and leading it himself.
In 614 however, the Christian empire was broken, in economic decline and entirely bankrupt. The distraught Byzantine economy, riven by 100 years of war with the Slavs, Bulgars and Parthians, could not recover. This lack of wealth mirrored its lack of military prowess. Phocas' misgovernment, inveterate high taxation, corruption and the incessant religious divides about the true nature of Christ, had made Byzantium impotent. Heraclius was in grave difficulty.
As Carroll relates, post Easter 614, within 30 days, the Persians took Jerusalem by undermining its walls, greatly aided by the Jews [I do not personally support any form of anti-Semiticism]. They wiped out 300 churches, and monasteries including the Church of the Resurrection of the Calvary, sold off 40.000 into slavery including sex-slavery, and gave the city back to the Jews, a payment in return for Jewish aid in reducing the fortress.
The only person who saved Jerusalem from total Persian annihilation was the Christian queen of Persia, Queen Shirin. She interdicted her power, and held up the eradication. It was she who arrested the blood, the rape, the destruction, the wanton obliteration of all things Christian. This will never appear in a Hollywood movie. Even so, the city was lost, and its main effect was to allow the Persians an easy access into Egypt, the granary of the Byzantine empire, which they easily reduced within 2 years. Byzantium was now broke and hungry.
By 615 the Christian Byzantine state was a rump of its former self. Exhausted by war, Persian Jihad, civil disputes, unrest, theological discord, and military unpreparedness, it was ripe for the picking when Islam came calling in 636 AD, in Syria, along the Yarmuk river. Thus is the untold story of how Submission destroyed Eastern Christendom. It won't appear on your evening's MSM grievance coverage of the week. Moslems and Persians [who became Moslem after a ridiculously bad military defense against the Arabs from 635-670]; are the victims; Christians are always the oppressors.
Without James Clerk Maxwell [1831-1879], Einstein cannot develop his theorems. Without Edward Morley [1838-1923]; the speed of light would not have been known in time for Einstein and others to postulate physical relativity, energy and mass. Without these 2 Christian scientists – among a host of others which could be named – the modern world of machines, motion, electricity and communications would not exist.
Morley precedes Einstein [link]:
Maxwell, a practicing Christian and role model non-pareil, was quite likely the most influential scientist since Newton. Without Maxwell, there is no Einstein.
“Dr. Richard Feynman, Nobel laureate and influential 20th-century modern physicist, paid his respects this way: 'From a long view of the history of mankind–seen from, say, ten thousand years from now– there can be little doubt that the most significant event of the 19th century will be judged as Maxwell’s discovery of the laws of electrodynamics.' Electricity and magnetism, mere curiosities when explored by Faraday and explained by Maxwell, turned out to generate more economic wealth than the entire British stock exchange. Our modern world is inconceivable without the experimental and theoretical foundation laid by these two great Christians and scientists who harnessed mysterious laws of nature for human benefit. [link]
There is no conflict between faith and scientist, or between real faith and reason. Unlike Christianity Islam does not enshrine reason - it is a cult of death and obedience. There never has been, and never could be a Moslem Morley, Maxwell, Faraday or Einstein. Islam preaches the opposite of rational investigation. It demands undying obeisance to Muhammad and his handbook of hate, Mein Koran.